khan

I just ignore nonsense, which trying by any means to undermine and belittle the Spl and our all time scorer is, you on the other hand enjoy nonsense and everything you read in the papers about Boyd. Just to reiterate he is ours and the SPL's all time goal scorer, maybe you would like to join your ally in contradicting the incontrovertible.

At this rate Santa will need to bring you a new shovel too, you certainly do like digging, if I were you I would quit while I was well behind, lol.

Oh dear the words of a malcontent who has realised he has not and never did have any valid points. :grin:

Perhaps Santa will bring you some nice handkerchiefs you will be able to dry your eyes with them.

I doubt I agree or ever would with anything you have to say about Boyd, and he is ours and the rest of the SPL's all time scorer irrespective of your extreme vendetta against a proven goal scorer.

That he is not ours and the rest of the SPL's record goalscorer, simples.

I think you should read your own post, "fat arse" "lazy boy" "waste of space" what a way to describe our record SPL scorer, of course you claim it is about attitudes, let's just say yours is plain to see.

Do you have any meaningful comparison between Boyd and Lafferty, one that would include goal scoring records and being a record holder.

Boyd's goal scoring total in the SPL should really broker no argument.

I think Ally may have a surprise in store, after starting at home against ICT with one up and isolated he may surprise us all and opt for the Levein formation at the piggery, I can only say please God do not let that happen.

Whittaker is a Rangers player the manager may decide but £20k+ contract may take the decision away from the manager,another important point there is no Glasgow Rangers.

Yes that is a lot more telling than anything else, and they have the cheek to take the title of professional athletes, big shake up in training regime required, what exactly do the coaches get handsomely paid for ? For those struggling to make ends meet and pay for their games it does not make good reading.

As I understand the the situation EBT's are perfectly legal when operated correctly. HMRC appear to be claiming we operated the scheme incorrectly I hesitate to use the term knowingly incorrectly as has been claimed in some quarters. Whatever the rights or wrongs, it certainly cannot be right that murray has divested himself of this mess for the princely sum of £1, he should and must be called to account as should the party responsible for the advice in the first instance, strangely we are unaware of who gave this advice even now.

I believe EBT's were still being used in 2010, which I would hazard was McIntyres watch.

The link below while proving nothing makes for interesting reading and throws up the name of Paul Baxendale-Walker again, said to have written the definitive book on EBT's along with our QC Andrew Thornhill. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=baxendale-walker%20sir%20david%20murray&source=web&cd=11&ved=0CBwQFjAAOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iii.co.uk%2Finvestment%2Fdetail%3Ftype%3D%26code%3Dcotn%253AMHG.L%26it%3Dle%26display%3Ddiscussion%26thread%3D8132709%26action%3Dlist&ei=iCTnToSiJ_OK4gSs67mTCQ&usg=AFQjCNEaQT-17U7sJwg-9gdZVARq2Yrk2A

I take it you are referring to our owner, while I may have my reservations about his business practices I draw the line at ad hominem attacks on his person or appearance, shows a lack of class. I am only thankful that he stepped up to the plate when no one else would, the outcome of his stepping up is as of yet uncertain, but for myself I am more than hopeful that we will carry the day in the FTTT. Any man who was willing to step up and attempt to clear up the financial carnage left by the previous regime deserves our support until he as with anyone shows that support to be misguided or misplaced. Please do not think that I see your points or views as anything less than valid and of course you are fully entitled to share them, I was a lot closer to your opinions than you may think, but I have accepted that we are where we are now and we must make the best of it we can, I still think the most likely outcome will be a share offer aimed at the fans. Apologies for my earlier posting, no excuse, a bad show on my part,apologies again.

It would appear that there are those who place no blame on those who had a fiduciary duty including those responsible for our financial well being, apparently a big boy with a stick did it and ran away.

One song (?) confirms it all mccourt's fenian army, it's ok for them but not for us, a bit like the N word for the hip black dudes. For Queen and Country is all I need and any politicain who thinks different can go and take a flying.

There is nothing to prevent Mr Whyte carrying out his statement as per circular. (e) The Rangers FC Group is to contribute to the Club the amount required to meet a liability owed by the Club to HM Revenue & Customs in relation to a discounted option scheme tax;

£500,00 has been paid to account by the previous regime leaving a shortfall of £3.7 million not complicated. What reasons HMRC would have in insisting on the full amount from Mr Whyte is open to interpretation I wouldn't really know, perhaps the urgency to arrest may give a clue.

You are indeed stupid, £500,00 has been paid to account by the previous regime leaving a shortfall of £3.7 million not complicated.

I happen to know that when HMRC attempted to arrest the shortfall £3.7 million someone very sensibly arranged for only £2.3 million to be sitting in the particular account, we can't have HMRC thinking they are a law unto themselves can we now.

He is nowhere near an EPL player, would still take EPL money for him though.

HMRC refused part payment, insisting on payment in full which obviously included the disputed penalty. I am well aware of the Aberdeen Asset Management judgement, it has no correlation to our own circumstances.

Whatever the team it will be one up, I don't think Ally will try the Levein formation, well hopefully not.