chilledbear 16 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 The question that needs answering here seems to be the one that is being avoided, will it take a statement from the auditor(s) to rectify that. One other thing, if the money that dinger had allegedly borrowed never existed in the accounts of rst, how could he have borrowed it. As I understand it he gauranteed/underwrote any loss, with his money , maybe one of our resident bean counters can enlighten. As far as I can make out, he bought tickets [a table] for a doo, and never paid for it, until 1/2 years later. Is this correct? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheWorthyEd Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 As far as I can make out, he bought tickets [a table] for a doo, and never paid for it, until 1/2 years later. Is this correct? That is my take on the events as I've read them. Self-confessed delayed payment. "Tic" as my old granny called it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 0 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 That is my take on the events as I've read them. Self-confessed delayed payment. "Tic" as my old granny called it. Which then was only advised to certain board members, wasn't disclosed in the Accounts, caused the RST to incur legal fees, was overseen by a self-confessed incompetent Treasurer, and wasn't told to the members ... until Mr Harris blew the whistle. But move on, there's nothing to see here. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheWorthyEd Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Which then was only advised to certain board members, wasn't disclosed in the Accounts, caused the RST to incur legal fees, was overseen by a self-confessed incompetent Treasurer, and wasn't told to the members ... until Mr Harris blew the whistle. But move on, there's nothing to see here. Who pays for the legal fees incurred? The overall RST membership........or the Board members (member) who caused the situation in the first instance? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 0 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Who pays for the legal fees incurred? The overall RST membership........or the Board members (member) who caused the situation in the first instance? RST membership. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 Haud oan a minit here, folks are playing hard and fast with the auditors signing off of said accounts, as far as I am aware he never classed the underwriting of the tables as a loan, anything but from what I read. So how come all of a sudden everybody knows better than the auditor, hope tae fek this isny turnin into another fekin "ellis sources told me" type of fiasco, and as sources and fiascos go.......that was the mother of all fekin fiascos... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 0 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 So how come all of a sudden everybody knows better than the auditor Some of us do... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmck 117 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 wabash you've got an excellent way of asking a single question 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 Some of us do... Spill, who is the auditor, Enron ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheWorthyEd Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 RST membership. So the RST membership, who have done no wrong other than to trust (sorry, no pun intended) a group of individuals to look after their money (shares) are being punished financially because of the incompetence or otherwise (let's not go there) of one or more of the RST Board members. That is shameful. The phrase "Could'nae run a menage" springs to mind. Surely any fair-minded individual would conclude that one or more of this present Board should resign immediately? The RST has been tarnished by all of this and it will take a long time to recover. Instead of growing year-upon-year it has turned inward and has become a shadow of what it purports to be. If I hadn't deliberately lapsed some time ago my resignation letter would be winging its way already. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.