forlanssister 3,060 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Statement urges Whyte to give up his shareholding. Perhaps this is merely a technical measure in their role as directors before Duff and Phelps can take alternative measures to achieve the same goal? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,356 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Perhaps this is merely a technical measure in their role as directors before Duff and Phelps can take alternative measures to achieve the same goal? I'm not aware of any such measures. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Rebo's Big Blue Nose 0 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Somehow I don't this little sheite is going to say "ok then..." He has shown that he has "balls" to take this thing this far so I can only see him digging his heels in TBH 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,060 Posted April 12, 2012 Author Share Posted April 12, 2012 I'm not aware of any such measures. They claim his shareholding to be an "irrelevance" for that statement to be truthful then they would have to take measures to do so but they fact that all their actions to do so so far extend to merely asking him to sign them over would indicate that Duff & Phelps are at a loss as how to separate Whyte from his shareholding. Of course the shareholding does become irrelevant if the buyers' preferred method of exiting administration is liquidation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.