der Berliner 3,234 Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 HMRC aside, now that Ticketus goes after Whyte directly for their 27m, will they be removed from the creditors' pot? I would imagine that they cannot demand their money back from two sources at the same time? As for the article and HMRC, the press really whips themselves into another frenzy here, thus putting further pressure on those making the decisions ... unless they sit in London. BTW, money of nurses? Mabye on the Hooped Horrors' next visit to Iborx, we should have a large banner proclaiming: "Your tax pays British soldiers!" 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 Can't they take money from the CVA and then sue Whyte for losses? What if Whyte loses and has the means from his companies to pay? He will have made a huge loss... You have to guess that his guarantor companies are about as solvent as Rangers... Or will be insolvent very soon. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wija 0 Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Hardly relentless and hardline - Vodfone walked away from billions owed without paying a penny. Using that case alone as a precedent, the Tax Man will be open to enormous scrutiny, and a pandora's box could well be opened. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.