Jump to content

 

 

The Sun today


Guest Stan Smith

Recommended Posts

wow, humour bypass?

 

wow, not really. just dont see whats humorous about it (although you're more than welcome to find it funny. ;))

 

x: i'm scared for my son

y: we're going to kill your son

 

everyone else: hahaha

 

dunno, just dont get it.

 

maybe if it was:

 

x: those horrible orange bastards are going to get my son

y (a horrible orange bastard): i'm going to kill your son

 

i could appreciate the irony, but it wouldnt really find it funny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Stan Smith
wow, not really. just dont see whats humorous about it (although you're more than welcome to find it funny. ;))

 

x: i'm scared for my son

y: we're going to kill your son

 

everyone else: hahaha

 

dunno, just dont get it.

 

maybe if it was:

 

x: those horrible orange bastards are going to get my son

y (a horrible orange bastard): i'm going to kill your son

 

i could appreciate the irony, but it wouldnt really find it funny.

fuk me what a mouthful. I'll drop it as our humour obviously differs and you have "considerations" also. I actually think the irony is girder like but, as you allude to, it takes all sorts.

Kinda means any other skanky basturt might think twice about doing the same though...which aint all bad :P

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely disgusting.

 

firstly the thought that someone would threaten a family like that - regardless of who they are related to and what that relation has done/believes.

 

secondly that a paper would report the story in such a mannor, clearly villifying (sp) rangers fans and supporting the notion that rangers are fundementally a sectarian club. which is completely wrong.

 

again, why is it the fans on the internet pick up on this and try and respond to such bias, yet the club sit back and take it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely disgusting.

 

firstly the thought that someone would threaten a family like that - regardless of who they are related to and what that relation has done/believes.

 

secondly that a paper would report the story in such a mannor, clearly villifying (sp) rangers fans and supporting the notion that rangers are fundementally a sectarian club. which is completely wrong.

 

again, why is it the fans on the internet pick up on this and try and respond to such bias, yet the club sit back and take it?

 

This one of the things that some fans are getting pxxxxd off about DM, as a chairman he just sits back and lets all this crap be said about us, he should come out and defend us......!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.