the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Fine let him invest but he ain't getting a controlling interest, and tell him to get it done before he starts shouting his mouth off. so he puts in more than the rest and gains less. why does green need control he wants the same as Kennedy a strong rangers with secure assets. doesn't he? conversely why does Kennedy feel he needs control. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 anyway as ever if green wants to stay nothing will stop him. for a man not courting bids he's getting a lot of them though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinker 887 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 so he puts in more than the rest and gains less. why does green need control he wants the same as Kennedy a strong rangers with secure assets. doesn't he? conversely why does Kennedy feel he needs control. I thought the idea was that no-one should have out-right control. Judging by our recent history, that's a solid idea. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldGers 0 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Why is it when there is total bs like this only Gunslinger thinks it's true ha ha. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Why is it when there is total bs like this only Gunslinger thinks it's true ha ha. I think we all know its true. greens courting bids, he's getting them. he just wants more as is his prerogative. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 I thought the idea was that no-one should have out-right control. Judging by our recent history, that's a solid idea. greens consortium own 100%. how is that not total. control. if Kennedy and 5 mates but 11% each will we still pretend no one man has total control. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldGers 0 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 I think we all know its true. greens courting bids, he's getting them. he just wants more as is his prerogative. As i have said, this might be happening in your world mate but not in the real one. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 green seems to want to sell 50% but remain in total control. he's offered that to Walter, the fans and now Kennedy. someone else puts in all the capital and green gets the reward and control. good luck to him getting that deal and good luck to us as he tries. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 As i have said, this might be happening in your world mate but not in the real one. fair enough mate. as I say green won't sell if he doesn't want to. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinker 887 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 greens consortium own 100%. how is that not total. control. if Kennedy and 5 mates but 11% each will we still pretend no one man has total control. It's a consortium of various groups and individuals. I guess you're suggesting they're all in cahoots which, admitttedly they might be - although there's no real evidence one way or the other. Regardless, there's nothing to stop BK or anyone else buying in and having an influence. Just not absolute control. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.