Bluedell 5,354 Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) As has been said already, a CEO runs a company on a day-to-day basis whereas a Chairman is more involved in strategy and would not necessarily be involved daily. A Chairman and the Board would normally have the power to appoint and sack a CEO and more power would normally lie there. Murray has in fact alluded to this and said that he has the power to sack Green. However I'm not so sure in this case. The power lies with who ever controls the board appointments and it's unclear as to who has this. It's almost certainly not Murray. It may be Green, it may be some of the shareholders (Zeus, BPH?). We don't know where the real power lies at the moment. Edited September 5, 2012 by Bluedell 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeardyGuts 6 Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 My understanding is that the chairman is more involved with the shareholders, making sure they are happy, fileding their concerns etc and attracting investment. While the CEO is involved in the day to day running of the club. But by the looks of things Green is involved in both of those to a certain extent. That doesn't mean to say that Murray isn't however. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.