the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Correct. MIH owned the shares and LBG owned 23% of MIH. and controlled a sight more than 23% 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,062 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 I doubt Murray can so much as fart without the permission of LBG, though Murray may own 70% of the voting stock compared to LBG's 30% LBG have complete control of other financial instruments as well as being the company's bankers. For all intents and purposes the Murray Group is but a subsidiary of LBG. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 if he wants a toilet roll for his executive bathroom i suspect muir has to sign a form. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 29, 2012 Author Share Posted November 29, 2012 And are we forgetting Lloyds have so much power because of his mismanagement and obsession with borrowing? It's really not an excuse for what he did to us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 29, 2012 Author Share Posted November 29, 2012 i think murrays made sure we know it was forced on him. not sure what difference him saying it would make. There's always ways, like he could have slipped the SFA some info to stop Whyte passing the fit and proper persons. But i'd say he was delighted to be rid of us regardless of what it meant for the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,062 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 And are we forgetting Lloyds have so much power because of his mismanagement and obsession with borrowing? It's really not an excuse for what he did to us. Far from being the excuse it's the motive. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 29, 2012 Author Share Posted November 29, 2012 Far from being the excuse it's the motive. I've never doubted Murray's motives, ego, personal gain and saving his own backside. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 There's always ways, like he could have slipped the SFA some info to stop Whyte passing the fit and proper persons. But i'd say he was delighted to be rid of us regardless of what it meant for the club. wouldn't have stopped him buying us only being a director. and the sfa helping us out. lol. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 29, 2012 Author Share Posted November 29, 2012 wouldn't have stopped him buying us only being a director. and the sfa helping us out. lol. No true, the FAPP can block a takeover i'm sure. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 i dont believe so. but i may be wrong. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.