Jump to content

 

 

Rangers chief Charles Green needs reminding of how his club became 'debt free'


Recommended Posts

hes rubbing everyone including the innocent who suffered noses in it.

 

sorry but that utter pish , 2 things . firstly HMRC , should never have been given £75 million towards the CVA vote , they hadnt won anything so should have been given a notional £1 , second why werent we offered a 3 year deal on paye like hearts , who are on their 4th mispayement of tax.

 

This nonsense about the innocents is just more drivel thats been trotted out buy the likes of Tom English and Stuart Cosgrove now that they have no where to go with the EBT case

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but that utter pish , 2 things . firstly HMRC , should never have been given £75 million towards the CVA vote , they hadnt won anything so should have been given a notional £1 , second why werent we offered a 3 year deal on paye like hearts , who are on their 4th mispayement of tax.

 

This nonsense about the innocents is just more drivel thats been trotted out buy the likes of Tom English and Stuart Cosgrove now that they have no where to go with the EBT case

 

 

we owed 4 million to small creditors. 20 million to hmrc outside of the big tax case. lastly any deal offered by whyte was a lie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We were forced into liquidation by HMRC and we had money that was due to us stolen by the SFA/SPL. Maybe that is where the creditors should address their queries.

 

In addition, I and thousands of others did not invest good money in recapitalising the club to see it go to creditors. That might sound harsh but just the way it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we owed 4 million to small creditors. 20 million to hmrc outside of the big tax case. lastly any deal offered by whyte was a lie.

 

At the time, that £4m was easily manageable. The small HMRC thing of £20m - if you are correct - was a farce. I can't remember what the original PAYE/VAT bill was, but I'm almost sure that more than 50% of that £20m was in notional levies. That's all a murky area where we would love to enlightened. Some stories say that CW offered repayment terms but was knocked back. I don't necessarily believe that. If CW was using PAYE/VAT to run the business, it's a criminal offence. I really find this part of the saga confusing, and would love some clarity. I don't see it being forthcoming from HMRC, it certainly wasn't from CW, and it certainly wasn't from D&P.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.