Darthter 542 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 You could be right....but it's still a lot, even if you get every game live. It is only a computer stream, after all, which most people can get for free, and probably better quality. I subscribe to RangerTV, and the stream is CONSIDERABLY better that the free-type ones!!! For fans abroad, it's probably not too much of an outlay to see their team play. If CG can convince more of them to subscribe then it all benefits the club long term!!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Testing 123. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Folks we won't be creating a generic Charles Green thread and we won't be outlawing general discussion about Charles Green and the new owners when it's relevant to the thread it's posted in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I subscribe to RangerTV, and the stream is CONSIDERABLY better that the free-type ones!!! For fans abroad, it's probably not too much of an outlay to see their team play. If CG can convince more of them to subscribe then it all benefits the club long term!!! Fair enough if it works for you. I just have real issues about paying for "internet streams" to watch football. The money goes to the "club", so I suppose it's not wasted. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Folks we won't be creating a generic Charles Green thread and we won't be outlawing general discussion about Charles Green and the new owners when it's relevant to the thread it's posted in. I didn't feel the Imran Ahmed discussion was relevant to the hopping the globe topic but fair enough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Folks we won't be creating a generic Charles Green thread and we won't be outlawing general discussion about Charles Green and the new owners when it's relevant to the thread it's posted in. Even if a few zoomers complain via pm?:devil: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I didn't feel the Imran Ahmed discussion was relevant but fair enough. There's always going to be some slight tangents on forum threads. Sometimes they're useful, sometimes not. No big deal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I didn't feel the Imran Ahmed discussion was relevant to the hopping the globe topic but fair enough. Imran slips under everyones radar, and he probably holds the most power. Probably even more than green. It's just that green is the public face. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Imran slips under everyones radar, and he probably holds the most power. Probably even more than green. It's just that green is the public face. Naturally I don't agree, the shares seem too widespread for someone to hold ultimate power. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,066 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I didn't feel the Imran Ahmed discussion was relevant to the hopping the globe topic but fair enough. Just who brought other directors into the conversation? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.