Jump to content

 

 

Dave Bassett on Charles Green


Recommended Posts

THERE was always one thing guaranteed at Sheffield United when Charles Green was in charge â?? turbulence.

 

And Dave Bassett has told Rangers fans to strap themselves in as the gruff Yorkshireman looks set to take the Light Blues on a similar rocky journey.

 

Green had a controversial three-year spell at Bramall Lane as owner Mike McDonaldâ??s right-hand man and Bassett was the first of many victims.

 

As the legendary manager put it to RecordSport: â??Charlie was openly brazen that things were going to change at

Sheffield United and that there would be some dead bodies about and I was one he was going to assassinate.�

 

But that was just the start of it. During Greenâ??s reign as chief executive, several long-standing members of staff left Bramall Lane including the club physio, kit man and several backroom staff.

 

In the last week at Ibrox, Ally McCoistâ??s chief scout Neil Murray and physio Philip Yeates have both left the club, striker Fran Sandaza has been sacked after he was the victim of a hoax call and the stadiumâ??s facilities manager, Ross Macaskill, has also left.

 

A source at the Blades, who was in a senior position at the club when McCoistâ??s former Ibrox team-mate Nigel Spackman was in charge, said: â??He got rid of people on the coaching staff and in other positions so he could get his own men in.

 

â??They werenâ??t the managerâ??s choices but it made him feel stronger. Heâ??d try and pull the wool over the managerâ??s eyes and get people in who are trustworthy in his view so he has the relationship rather than the manager. Itâ??s his only way of getting an â??inâ?? into the playing side.

 

â??Youâ??ve got to be very careful where Charles is concerned. In the end the power goes to his head. Heâ??ll be caught up with being in charge of Rangers and being in the papers and the TV.

 

â??And heâ??s not answerable to anyone because you donâ??t know who the investors are.â?

 

Green, of course, was behind the recent share issue at Rangers which raised £22million and it was a similar story at

Sheffield United.

 

A share issue at the Blades came on the back of the club seemingly showing ambition with big-name signings being made but they were later sold when things went wrong.

 

Bassettâ??s seven-year spell as Blades boss was cut short when Green axed him and they later had a dispute over his pay-off when the Londoner said he didnâ??t receive his compensation in full. Green offered to sort it out in the car park but Bassett

called his bluff and the tough-talking Yorkshireman quickly backed down.

 

Eighteen years after those events, Bassett said: â??I would love to have had the chance to take negotiations further in the car park. He didnâ??t want to.â?

 

But asked for his take on recent events at Rangers, with Green yesterday claiming he deceived Craig Whyte to get the keys to Ibrox after previously playing down the former ownerâ??s role in the creation of the newco, Bassett said: â??It doesnâ??t surprise me what is happening at Rangers.

Bassett was ready to fight Green in car park

Julian Finney/Getty Images

 

â??Where Charlieâ??s involved, thereâ??s always turbulence. My successor at United, Howard Kendall, was backed with cash because they had to improve the company due to the launch of a share issue.

 

â??They spent some money and did some trading with players because if you wanted to float the company you had to show it was being successful.

 

â??They had to give the impression they wanted to get to the Premiership otherwise fans wouldnâ??t have bought shares.

 

â??During the flotation they made a killing on the shares. When Sheffield United became a limited company there was a lot of money swilling about and Iâ??m sure they did very well out of it. Fans later actually called for an investigation into the whole share issue.

 

â??I only worked with Charles for a short space of time and he wasnâ??t in a position where he sacked anyone that had an impact on me but I know with the likes of Nigel Spackman that this happened.

 

â??Nigel was treated like s**t. Charlie made it quite plain he was in charge of the team and that Nigel had to conform. Managers were kept on their toes, put it that way.

 

â??I know enough about Charlie to realise that there will always be things happening and a lack of stability. Charlie and

continuity donâ??t go hand in hand.

 

â??When Charlie started at Sheffield he wasnâ??t interested in making any friends with the staff or anyone â?? and it was the same when he left.

 

â??Heâ??s not remembered fondly but he doesnâ??t care whether he is or not. Heâ??s loyal to the people who employ him. Thereâ??s no doubt he was loyal to Mike McDonald when he was at Sheffield United.

 

â??Charlieâ??s not an emotional person â?? making decisions that are unpleasant isnâ??t a problem for him.

 

â??I knew Mike a bit and he used Charlie as a hatchet man. He went in and did all the nasty jobs that had to be done and he was capable of doing that. He was comfortable about it.

 

â??Iâ??ve met a few ruthless people in my time but a lot of business people are ruthless. They havenâ??t made their money or been successful businessmen by being nice to people. Theyâ??ve all had a spell where theyâ??ve made ruthless decisions.

 

â??Charlie wasnâ??t my cup of tea but he was never going to be because he was coming in to sack me and I knew that so

immediately we were at loggerheads. Iâ??d be worried about anything Charlie is involved with.

 

â??Charlie might make money for Rangers and I wouldnâ??t put it past him that the club could get sold to someone else after heâ??s cut them to whatever requirements.

United owner McDonald with new Blades boss Spackman and Green in 1997

Sheffield Newspapers Ltd

 

â??Rangers is a business. It could be Barratt Homes or Scottish Power. Charlieâ??s not in love with the product.

 

â??Iâ??ve said before how he said to me if he could make more money turning Bramall Lane into a potato field then heâ??d do it.

 

â??And these people who are with him will be there to move Rangers on and come out with a profit.

 

â??Charlie has floated a few firms over the years and has earned some good money.â?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the smear campaign* against Green slowly takes up momentum as the league reconstruction debate hots up. Luckily enough, the latter will probably torpedoed by the SPL's very own members, who appear not willing to sit on Lawwell's lap.

 

*No matter how you feel about him, this is becoming very obvious. The media just loves that and thus keep their story about the big bad Rangers running. A feast for the likes of Keevins, Spence, Martin and Co., something they won't want to give up in a hurry ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.