SteveC 150 Posted February 8, 2014 Author Share Posted February 8, 2014 oh well at least I just agreed with you on another thread. I guess, it's been that kind of miraculous weekend 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Mainly because I disagree with summations like this. With a slight element of fishing. It's admirable that you stick to your guns but I think it is about time to admit you are wrong. You are just being pig headed on the issue because it is proved beyond all doubt that man is a swindling cunt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 They can only clear him of not having signed this paper, not all his crimes. What is it with y and Green? Your are obsessed with loving the serial lying, Rangers' robbing c@nt. It's like a Jew admitting Hitler (Whyte) was a bit bad but Himmler's a darling If this is the crux of Police Scotland's case, all it proves is that Green's prints weren't on a particular piece of paper (before or after it was printed.) It would also suggest that Police Scotland are particularly dense. As a matter of factual enlightenment, Police Scotland are very far from dense and are actually rather smart. This would suggest to me that whoever is putting this story about is also smart and thinks that we are dense. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.