Compliance Officer: "Insufficient Evidence" for Simunovic incident

[buster. 4,808]

3 hours ago, Rick Roberts said:

I saw a thread or two on twitter. There's plenty of them but nothing definitive. In fact, given the way the BBC deal with highlights there's probably twice as many that we'll never even hear about.

 

Griffiths banging another players head on the ground and Brown flicking his boot in someones face spring to mind, on top of the one's commonly referenced.

 

Here's what annoys me. The club must have someone looking at and collecting this info and data, surely? It'd be easy enough for them to get something together and distribute it. 

 

 

 

What you need is access, software and a level of ability.

A reasonably professional job that could produce a utube video that focussed on the worst examples.

 

Perhaps the club could do something towards it but without the need to take any credit.

 

 

[cooponthewing 1,139]

4 minutes ago, buster. said:

What you need is access, software and a level of ability.

A reasonably professional job that could produce a utube video that focussed on the worst examples.

 

Perhaps the club could do something towards it but without the need to take any credit.

 

 

Absolutely Buster? 

[Rick Roberts 246]

1 hour ago, buster. said:

What you need is access, software and a level of ability.

A reasonably professional job that could produce a utube video that focussed on the worst examples.

 

Perhaps the club could do something towards it but without the need to take any credit.

 

 

The BBC watch thread on this site is as good an example of what is required for "incidents" and other stuff as any. It's that simple. Yet you seldom see it.