Jump to content

 

 

TheWeissMan

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    44

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by TheWeissMan

  1. TheWeissMan
    Thanks SBS
  2. TheWeissMan
    The Easdales businesses read very much like Scott Murdochs and Paul Murrays. Absolutely nothing of note to say he is good for us, loads of dissolved companies and liabilities of £10m against assets of £4m.
  3. TheWeissMan
    I dont pretend to be neutral as far as PM is concerned but as ranger_syntax pointed out, i am NOT RangersMedia. Im a poster on there who for 9 months was unpopular because of my views being at the complete opposite end of the scale to the majority. However, it should be pointed out that unlike other Rangers forums, and im not meaning this one, i was always allowed my opinion and my posts were NEVER removed. Thats neutrality. Not a dictatorship.
  4. TheWeissMan
    I am anti PMurray, Anti RST, Anti Mark Dingwall, Anti FF, Anti MMurray however i was a huge supporter of Chris at the beginning when he first appeared on the scene on television and was writing blogs. My opinion changed of him when he got in tow with the RST and his demeanour completely changed. I dont mind admitting any of that. It is my opinion.
  5. TheWeissMan
    I can only speak for myself as im far from taking the RM line as my posting history easily proves. Paul Murray lied about reducing our debt. In the 2 years after he joined, our debt rose from £16m to £31m at which point Muir was appointed to the Board and a reduction plan was put in place to bring it down to the £18m we paid Lloyds when the crook took over. Paul Murray lied about running Rangers on a Domestic break even model during his reign. Without European football we would have accumulated over £30m of losses in those 4 years. Apparently this is how he plans to run us if he gets back in. Paul Murray in 2003 was charged with bringing in £200m of investment for Martin Currie. Having achieved only 10% of that, he left the business and Martin Currie had to suspend the fund. Since that date, there is nothing in Company check that would suggest to me that Paul Murray is capable of running our club. In each of his current businesses, the liabilities are greater than the assets and the cash balances have been dramatically falling since 2008 to all time lows in 2012. Now when we throw the other 2 guys in, Malcolm Murray and Scott Murdoch, between the 3 of them, their current portfolio has accumulated liabilities of £86 million with assets of £29 million. For the life of me, i cannot see how anyone can take those facts, as they are actual year end audited accounts figures, and have any sort of trust in this team to deliver. They are telling us they are going to get investors in and run the club on a break even basis. With the exception of ONE company between them, no other business they are involved in is doing so. For me that tells a BIG story about the calibre of these gents. This is all my opinion and is not based on me being a "RM poster boy" and i will never make the mistake of others and claim i am speaking for "the majority" or even for "RM". Its my considered opinion only. I am always willing to learn new information though and i am happy to debate the business results, however it appears in the main, its is standard, non specific insults that get thrown about. "absolute rubbish" "RM poster boy" "its Jack Irvine" "bottom of the barrel" Go through the factual information and pick out why we should back the Murrays and Co.
  6. TheWeissMan
    The source is at the top of the page. Its from Company Check - a searchable database of all UK companies and Directors. http://companycheck.co.uk/director/907102823
  7. TheWeissMan
    Take out any opinions and show me anything on his publicly available directorships that is positive. This is someone who is trying to get in to run our club. I think i have the right to know what im letting myself in for with my vote.
  8. TheWeissMan
    Jack Irvine was a huge fan of Craig Whyte. I am on record as not being and said so throughout. This seems at times the only answer people have when faced with information that doesnt sit comfortable with them. "Lets say its Jack" For the record, Irvine should be booted as far away as possible from our club. Stockbridge with him in my opinion.
  9. TheWeissMan
    There is no need to do this. Its looking back and i have never been Greens biggest fan. Im certainly glad he is no longer there. As per a previous post, you should remember me as TheAlukoMan, now TheLawMan (need to stop changing players as they always leave) and back in the day, we were mostly in tune on Craig Whyte despite the protestations of many. I am most certainly not a RM poster boy as people would see it.
  10. TheWeissMan
    He isn't. Forget any opinions in the Opening post. Just look at the facts. (tu)
  11. TheWeissMan
    Anyone who was on RangersMedia between May 2011 and 14th February 2012 will know i was saying all the same things about Whyte, usually backed by ForlansSister from this forum. I was finding similar information and said as early as August 2011 that we would be in administration in 2012. You can imagine the names i was called at the time and the accusations that were thrown my way, but i never wavered on Whyte.
  12. TheWeissMan
    Bluedell, I appreciate that loads of companies are dissolved for normal reasons but to be honest that wasnt the main point being made. The main conclusion i am taking from all of the current Directorships is that with the exception of CWM Partners which is fairly healthy, the rest of the companies accounts, figures, liabilities are absolutely abysmal. Yet, we are supposed to believe these 4 individuals are the right people to take us forward. Excluding CWM Partners, what in these guys Directorship history tells us that they will be good for us ? What am i missing ?
  13. TheWeissMan
    Just as fans/businesses are under no obligation to buy season tickets, hospitality packages, player of the year passes and sponsorship packages. People felt we "deserved better" last year, well we certainly "deserve better" this year.
  14. TheWeissMan
    I suggested this over on RM, but should have checked this site out first on this issue. Its clear to me that the people getting in front of him are not willing to ask the real testing questions. We should have guys like yourself Bluedell and other clued up supporters/investors in a room and asking the searching questions that will either put our collective minds at rest or really throw shite at the fan. As things stand, it appears that the main questions we are asking are about backing the fans, tunnel spats and police/media conspiracies. Out of curiosity, have you been offered or looked to create a chance to do such a thing BD?
  15. TheWeissMan
    There hasnt, to my knowledge been any tested cases in Scotland, specific to this issue, but the parallels are drawn and if faced with the case, it would be much easier to follow a precedent rather than trying to dance around their own rules in my opinion.
  16. TheWeissMan
    Is it possibly due to the fact that these rankings are just made up in someones head and bare no relevance to anything other than in this guys head. lol In the real world, where it actually officially counts, we are 19 places higher than them. http://www.xs4all.nl/~kassiesa/bert/uefa/data/method4/trank2011.html
  17. TheWeissMan
    The basics of the Southampton case were that the authorities could prove that Southampton Leisure Holdings were only in existence due to Southampton FC. This meant that when SLH filed for administration, the authorities deemed Southampton FC in administration even although technically speaking they were not. So, if MIH were to have went under a few months back, which lets face it, was a real possibility, then Rangers status with the Football authorities would have been fine, as long as we could prove we were able to operate efficiently, which we have been. Now that Wavetower has taken over, this is a game changer. If Wavetower has borrowed �£18m from the city or some other investor and they fail to make payments and are taken to court and wound down, then irrespective of our Balance Sheet, P&L or Cashflow being healthy at that given time, we will be deemed as being in administration and subject to the footballing penalties that go with that.
  18. TheWeissMan
    Irrespective if Rangers owe Wavetower �£18 million or not, with this transaction, we are still at greater risk than what we were previously. Because Wavetower have been specifically set up to fund and run Rangers, any liquidation or administration they suffer will hit our Club and we will be deemed as being in the same terms on a footballing side (See Southampton Leisure Holdings). This was NOT the case under MIH as MIH had other interests. So......if Wavetower have borrowed the �£18 million (I would bet my hat collection they have), even if our liabilities show �£0 at the 30th June 2011, we are nowhere near out of trouble.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.