Ergatrude

Did she just try to take credit for throwing money at a non-issue?

Thing is though, I was studying fitness, diet & nutrition, physiology amongst other things at the time & the evidence did suggest that short sessions with progressive overload was better for the body than just spending all day in the gym. It was also different on a case by case basis. I would agree, however that the theory should be mandatory.

That's another point I'd like to know, he mentioned singing the national anthem and whether it would be offensive or not. If we can't sing "Sent them homeward tae think again" can England fans still sing "Rebellious Scots to crush"? I'm not offended by either, but surely it could be construed that way?

Road trip!

It wasn't on the BBC though. The presenters earpiece must have been ringing as he tried several times to change the subject away from Rangers/Ibrox. Either that or he's a bear

Cheers mate, I just spat coke over my new laptop.

At the moment the cancer seems to be one-upsmanship.

I found it a bit odd that the police officer only mentioned Rangers, the Celtic fan only spoke about Rangers and the coloured MP guy only spoke about Rangers (except for when he spoke about singing YNWA at Parkhead every weekend).

As a non-religious Scot I agree with you. Personally I think putting "fuck" in front of someones name shouldn't be offensive no matter who it is. At the end of the day though, people can take offense to whatever they want & with the OBB pending I think we should be careful.

A lecturer of mine at college 6 years ago worked there & he said training was 11-1, with after lunch sessions/classes being optional. Probably changed now though.

In the first half I heard 'a fathers advice' with the usual 'fuck bobby sands' shout twice. Not excusable but hardly 90 minutes.

I commented on the games thread at the time that the fans were letting us down. I heard them singing an offensive song twice in the first half, I muted the second half cause' Burley had pissed me off. Edit: The song was the same both times & it was 'a fathers advice'.

Well that clarified nothing other than the fact Celtic fans still think they are innocent in everything. I think we should've had a better representative there tbh, John didn't say too much.

I was thinking the same thing. Why would anyone join our club on low wages when it was all over the media that Shagger, Whitty & Davis were getting 25k p/w.

The article says this: But his impressive performances at the heart of the defence have forced Rangers to already open talks as they look to dangle the carrot of improved terms – as long as he is willing to sign a long-term deal. I agree, but based on the contracts that some players at the club are allegedly on I'd put him on 12-16k p/w.

To be fair I don't think he asked for this. It does say that Rangers have been 'forced' to open talks with him due to his performances. What's he on anyway? I'd say he's worth 12-16k p/w.

Much clearer. Would you like us to comment on your blogs here or on the blog site?

Aye, but I mean I seen it as a smiley years ago on Messenger plus! back when it was virus ridden.

A guy in a Gers top pissin on a Celtic top. Seen it somewhere years ago.

Having just had my nightly read through the forums though I would say that there seems to be a bit of confusion over Agree/Thanks and I agree with Pete about it clogging the page up. For this reason maybe Brahim is right and Agree/Disagree is the way forward.

I disagree, I like to thank people for their article. I also like to thank people for replying to a post I have made, even if I don't agree with what they say. I agree a post if I agree with the comment and don't want to add another post basically saying the same as someone else.

You could try giving the lettering a black outline?

Great Blog Danny.

Fair point. In terms of first team regulars I'd agree with you.

Well said Calscot. Maybe write an article about it & get it on the site?