pete

The ref was certainly not great and influenced certain passages of play. If they were decisive is debatable.

I actually think I could do a god job.

I never said you said that I just reacted to your post.

The Ref was not the main reason for us losing points. To think that is burying your head in the sand.

I am honestly not certain Davis is our answer. I would rather have a player that can split defences and score 15 goals a season from midfield and Davis is not that player.

We don't know that. I think we are forgetting it is Davis 6 years further who can't get a game for a struggling EPL team.

Thankfully!

The biggest fault PLG made was letting Barry Ferguson back into the team.

That was a statement once made by Dick Advocaat. Not word for word but he said sometimes it is good to let the other team have the ball.

We may not win it but it is far from over. Kilmarnock will take points off of most teams. Just thank god we don't watch them as our team. No wonder Scottish football is knackered when the second top team in the league can produce nothing better than ten men in their last third for 95% of the game.

I think we are going back to 4-2-3-1. Kilmarnock also have 5 in the middle of the park. I guess Fod is getting tonight in place of Sunday to keep him happy.

Does that mean that there are not younger better players than Davis out there. I am not interested if Davis is better than our current squad I would prefer to look at players we can develop and make a profit on and not get back to filling knackers stable.

I am afraid I know the meaning of real torture. living with my wife for 30+ years has been real bloody torture.

I am not for bringing back old players as it hardly ever works. Gerrard was just bumming up the scouting team in his presser. If a 34 year old Steven Davis is the best they can come up with then god help us.

The problem I have with that Frankie is we become lopsided and easier to play against as other teams know Flanagan is not going to be a danger. It also puts more pressure on Kent as the defenders don't have to reckon on a defender flying up the wing which means Kent has to beat the player with trickery and speed which doesn't always work.

My critique of Flanagan is not a reaction from Sunday I have thought it for a few weeks now and Sunday just verified it for me. I was maybe a bit loose in saying he was slightly better defender than Hodson as Hodson was very poor at times but Flanagan leaves a lot to be desired. It may be unfair given that he is on the wrong wing but many attacking minded players prefer that so that they can cut inside and shoot. l

I hope not. I also hope Barasic is fit soon so as Flanagan is not in the team.

Don't worry I had similar too. There is always someone who doesn't like you.

Now you are making things up I said Flanagan can defend better. Going forward there is nothing in it or Hodson may even be slightly better than Flanagan as Flanagan offers totally nothing going forward.

He was good in a 4-3-2-1 he is not suited to a 4-3-3 imo,

Funny how Tavernier seems to get it forward on a regular basis but Flanagan can't. That is a hell of a lot of other reasons per game.

Yes but when the law judges on Rangers then common sense prevails and not the written law.

Agreed but if Tav or he is injured we only have Flanagan and I aired my opinion on him. The Mermaid took him to the cleaners on Sunday and as I say he offers nothing going forward and is part of the problem of just passing it to Worrel or Goldson.

Yes I forgot to put in Jack and Coulibaly. It was late when I wrote it.

A post like this is just a waste of space.