Jump to content

 

 

Rangers fail to shake off shackles of mediocrity


Recommended Posts

By Glenn Gibbons

 

The most depressing aspect of the general decline in the standard of Scottish football is that, at the top end, it seems to be not only readily accepted, but embraced.

In this regard, Rangers, as champions, have the responsibility of representing the country. As such, they have been over the past couple of seasons the kind of ambassadors whose questionable comportment at times would occasion the need to take refuge in diplomatic immunity.

 

Of course, it is an old truth that supporters - especially those unused to the kind of regular trophy-gathering that is the preserve of the Old Firm - will acclaim success in any guise. It is very likely, for example, that Hearts' unconvincing penalty shoot-out victory over Gretna - after a conspicuously unimpressive 1-1 draw - in the 2006 Scottish Cup final was celebrated as intensely as their inspired 3-1 defeat of Celtic in the corresponding fixture 50 years earlier.

 

But, as the touchstone by which the level of excellence in the SPL is to be evaluated, Rangers in the last two Champions League campaigns will have left the impression around Europe of an old gem that has long since lost its lustre.

 

Walter Smith has been able to claim, with a degree of justification, a certain improvement in the performance of his Ibrox side in the group phase that ended in Turkey on Tuesday compared with that which left them seriously embarrassed last season. But, in truth, three goals scored and one victory gained - the latter by a single goal at home to a Bursaspor team who took one point from the series - in six matches is hardly the stuff of dreams.

 

Nor is the need to have come from behind to salvage points in six of 14 domestic league games this season, or to have won the same number of fixtures by a single-goal margin, on too many occasions leaving either Smith or his deputy, Ally McCoist, to tell the post-match media conference that "we weren't at our best today".

 

Coming through these various trials successfully is, understandably, acclaimed by Rangers supporters as an indicator of the players' unquenchable spirit. But to place such a positive emphasis on their character is to ignore the mediocrity that often necessitates the resilience.

 

Simply better-than-average sides, far less exceptional ones, tend to be, in the main, less troubled and more convincing than the Scottish champions have been at home and abroad these past two seasons. There could hardly be a more damning commentary on a team's capabilities than that which has been applied to Rangers - that they are at their best when they don't have the ball.

 

What should disturb the club's followers more than anything is that acknowledgement of the team's deficiencies begins not with media critics, but with Smith himself.

 

The manager has been regularly on record with the claim that his ultra-defensive philosophy, especially in Europe, springs from his conviction that his players are not good enough to flirt with a more open and adventurous style without being

picked off by demonstrably superior opponents.

 

It is quite bizarre to note that the Rangers player who often shows the most aggressive instinct in their European games - who appears at times to have the unbridled instinct for flight of a prisoner who has gone over the wall - is the central defender, Madjid Bougherra.

 

Yet, to the neutral observer, it is often clear that skilful, inventive and potentially incisive players such as Steve Davis and Steven Naismith are shackled by cautiousness, conditioned to looking behind rather than ahead for team-mates. It is the tactical equivalent of playing in leg irons.

 

What should disturb followers of the other 11 SPL teams, including Celtic, is that, despite their imperfections, the reigning champions have shown themselves over the past two campaigns to be unarguably - and by a considerable distance - the best.

 

 

http://sport.scotsman.com/sport/Glenn-Gibbons-Rangers-fail-to.6657506.jp?articlepage=2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye fuck right off. With the level of investment our squad has had over the past five years it's a miracle we have enjoyed the success we have. Hang on it's not a bloody miracle it's a testament to a wonderful man manager and determined group of players. Mediocrity indeed. Bitter tim c**t.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair, he does seem to hit on some home truths. A typically dour, negative, Scottish attitude to Rangers. He seems to forget that any player we do seem to get that is capable of playing this attacking open football gets cherry picked by teams with vast amounts of money at there disposal.

 

He's not wrong, but one paragraph to comment on the state of the other teams is doing Rangers a disservice. This guys glass is most definitely half empty - but sometimes that is needed so that we strive for better?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not wrong, but one paragraph to comment on the state of the other teams is doing Rangers a disservice. This guys glass is most definitely half empty - but sometimes that is needed so that we strive for better?

 

He's a **** cunt who always writes negatively about us. I didn't read past the first paragraph.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a **** cunt who always writes negatively about us. I didn't read past the first paragraph.

 

Didn't know if it was a pessimistic rangers view (know plenty of fans with that philosophy) or a jealous Tim. Don't really follow the journos but will take your word for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't know if it was a pessimistic rangers view (know plenty of fans with that philosophy) or a jealous Tim. Don't really follow the journos but will take your word for it.

 

Hate calling they fukks tims as that's the name they call themselves they are tai_gs pure and simple.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't know if it was a pessimistic rangers view (know plenty of fans with that philosophy) or a jealous Tim. Don't really follow the journos but will take your word for it.

 

I don't make a habbit of following his, or other journo's work for that matter, just recognise the name and know his m.o.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.