bluebear54 0 Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Well - in my book it's time for an EGM and all the shareholders can get a chance to sort out the wheat from the chaff. As far as I'm concerned - no-one on the present board has covered themselves with glory - we've been in a dark place and there's no light yet at the end of the tunnel. And regarding Craig Whyte - I wouldn't know him from Adam - but I'd like to hear what he has to say. So - what do you say guys? EGM? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Well - in my book it's time for an EGM and all the shareholders can get a chance to sort out the wheat from the chaff.As far as I'm concerned - no-one on the present board has covered themselves with glory - we've been in a dark place and there's no light yet at the end of the tunnel. And regarding Craig Whyte - I wouldn't know him from Adam - but I'd like to hear what he has to say. So - what do you say guys? EGM? With the amount of shares Murray has I would imagine he would have to be the one to call it. I also don't think Whyte is allowed to speak without breaking stock-market rules. Not sure though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 0 Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 What gets me is why didn;t he come in with a plan months if not years ago???????? Like all of us, i have been sitting here puzzling and getting frustrated about all this. I've come to the conclusion that the current board are all fucking "yes men" and none have had the backbone to knock on SDM's door and give him it straight. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 What gets me is why didn;t he come in with a plan months if not years ago???????? Like all of us, i have been sitting here puzzling and getting frustrated about all this. I've come to the conclusion that the current board are all fucking "yes men" and none have had the backbone to knock on SDM's door and give him it straight. Agreed - and that should be one question to be put to all our directors. Why? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 What gets me is why didn;t he come in with a plan months if not years ago???????? Like all of us, i have been sitting here puzzling and getting frustrated about all this. I've come to the conclusion that the current board are all fucking "yes men" and none have had the backbone to knock on SDM's door and give him it straight. Most people blame Murray for the sorry state of affairs at Rangers when in actual fact it's these guys on the board who are supposed to have been running the club. Well, they haven't done a very good job. It's high time they forgot about bloody prawn sandwiches and started running RFC properly. No wonder Muir was sent in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 0 Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Most people blame Murray for the sorry state of affairs at Rangers when in actual fact it's these guys on the board who are supposed to have been running the club. Well, they haven't done a very good job. It's high time they forgot about bloody prawn sandwiches and started running RFC properly. No wonder Muir was sent in. Exactly. Murray gets shit, and deservedly so, but those idiots, as you rightly say, run the club from day to day. I read tonight one is a chartered accountant!!!!! He should be fucking sacked on the spot. The thing is, this is going to get very ugly now, i don;t blame CW if he walks, i do acceot that we must be sceptical about him but like most, i'm prepared to take the dive and support him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 I remember a statement saying that the board had voted to send the club into administration and they voted 4-2. I don't know, but it could possibly have been King that voted for administration hoping to pick up the scraps on the cheap. As I say I don't know just speculation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 Probably not picking you up right bud, but does this mean there was individual briefing's between board members/Whyte camp and they all spoke badly about each other? Yes , a few weeks ago at the herald offices in Glasgow 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 I guess Mr King can telephone Joe Lewis to find out what is at the centre of a doughnut. Joe Lewis was always just the front for ENIC , this myth about lewis is painful 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Joe Lewis was always just the front for ENIC , this myth about lewis is painful Regardless of whether it was Joe Lewis or ENIC.... I believe the point that 26th was making is that King's share valuation is close to bugger all, same as Joe's/ENIC's. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.