mmckgers 4 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 If we can get him on a relatively small fee, I dont see the issue in not paying Aberdeen some cash. To me, it seems that there is something wrong in the rules if a player can leave and still be linked back to a previous club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 If we can get him on a relatively small fee, I dont see the issue in not paying Aberdeen some cash. To me, it seems that there is something wrong in the rules if a player can leave and still be linked back to a previous club. 23 is far to old to still be considered a youngster and would add that the player must have been at the club for 5 years. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,245 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Aberdeen just want to cash in, no matter what. They signed him and put him in the first squad straight away, 27 games per season during his stay tells this story. They bought him for 50k, he is a freebie now, so I actually cannot see the point in them claiming ANY money at all - they just want to cash in. Have we had any precedence to Aberdeen's claim? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Aberdeen just want to cash in, no matter what. Exactly and that's why they gave us Ricky Foster on loan then turned round after we'd given him some valuable experience and said they wanted mega money to sell him. Absolute chancers! Obviously trying to weasel in on the action after seeing us giving other SPL clubs millions of pounds in the past 5 years. I hope we sign Aluko and they end up getting sweet Fanny Adams!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted November 23, 2011 Share Posted November 23, 2011 Also, if it does go to a tribunial, they should only get around half their claim. Maybe less! I still don't see how it should stop him playing for us though? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,411 Posted November 23, 2011 Share Posted November 23, 2011 RossPerry90 Ross Perry Good wee win against stmirren today. Won 3-1. Flecky ran the show, scored twice. Aluko scored a free kick. Now I'm heading to the dentist 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted November 23, 2011 Share Posted November 23, 2011 I notice that Kerkar won the penalty when he was brought down in the box. He always seems to get mentioned for doing something good but yet never seems to be considered for the first team. Strange! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,245 Posted November 23, 2011 Share Posted November 23, 2011 Interestingly enough, Aluko "follows" rfc_lindsay, rfc_dickson, the RST and TomCommentator on twitter. Wonder how this talk between his agent and the Sheep went. Regarding Kerkar ... yep, he scored and scores goals in friendlies et al, but hardly gets playing time in the first team. Even now, when Wylde is injured. Sometimes the way we deal with players is ... odd. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim White 0 Posted November 23, 2011 Share Posted November 23, 2011 Aberdeen have announced that they will seek compensation from Rangers should the SPL leaders award a full-time contract to Sone Aluko. More... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted November 23, 2011 Share Posted November 23, 2011 The Kerkar situation is certainly a strange one! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.