BlueMazza 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Author Share Posted April 11, 2012 Thanks Frankie. In the SPL statement it says all but two are to be voted on at 8-4. Gonna go re-read. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Author Share Posted April 11, 2012 1 and 2a are huge changes and should require an 11-1 vote. I feel an email to.SPL coming on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Excuse my ignorance, will Rangers not be represented at this general meeting on April 30th? Reason I'm asking is, if they are then it'll be 11-1, if not then 11-0. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Excuse my ignorance, will Rangers not be represented at this general meeting on April 30th? Reason I'm asking is, if they are then it'll be 11-1, if not then 11-0. We're currently being represented by the administrators at all important meetings. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Agreed. Any new changes to any rules would have to be put in place for future events such as what Rangers are going through just now. It must be bordering on illegal what they are trying to do?.What about the TV deal?,are they forgetting that this deal is on the strength of Rangers being part of this deal?. In reality, they are for future events. We will not see any more punishments for this season's administration. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 In reality, they are for future events. We will not see any more punishments for this season's administration. Lets hope so. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 In reality, they are for future events. We will not see any more punishments for this season's administration. Whether or not we see any more punishments for this season's administration depends on when we actually come out of administration. There's a cut-off date which would trigger starting next season with the standard points deduction for administration which is currently 10 points, but since they're now going to vote on the following: Resolution 1 proposes an increase in the sporting sanction (points deduction) on any Club which suffers or is subject to an Insolvency Event from 10 points to the greater of 15 points and 1/3 of the Club’s SPL points in the preceding season. ...and apparently vote on it with an 8-4 voting structure, then it's very likely that IF Resolution 1 is passed we would be starting next season with a serious points deduction if we haven't exited administration by a certain date. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 ...and apparently vote on it with an 8-4 voting structure, then it's very likely that IF Resolution 1 is passed we would be starting next season with a serious points deduction if we haven't exited administration by a certain date. A period of administration which has now just been extended... conveniently for both parties. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 1 and 2a are huge changes and should require an 11-1 vote. I feel an email to.SPL coming on. Resolution 1 is an absolutely MASSIVE decision! 2a is actually a very good deal which I think we should vote in favour of. 2b is completely absurd! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,302 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Initial thoughts ... reads like 2008 revisited, just on a different level. One team (and JUST ONE team) is in trouble and the SPL/SFA do their utmost not to be supportive. (Have they been to Japan as yet?) Second thoughts ... someone should make UEFA aware of one member association / league is not exactly playing fairly here towards one of its members. Reasons have been given above. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.