GovanAllan 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 Leggo back on script with the anti-Green stuff, the licence hold up nothing to do with the absolute crap surrounding the sanctions then. As for the staff meeting when was he supposed to have held it the day before he pays them off, and I see he's going with the untruthful account of what was said at the meeting. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,292 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 When will Leggat focus on Celtic's companies, Hearts', Hibs', Dundee United's et al? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 its a rangers blog. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 So the transfer ban is nothing to do with it then? More Leggo shite. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 the sfa have confirmed they require more info. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeeBlueDevil 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 the sfa have confirmed they require more info. Has Green refused to give the information required or did he say they were in constant contact with the SFA regarding the issues surrounding the SFA membership ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim1955 12 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 Green is abroad talking to Uefa, he's not walking away. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 Has Green refused to give the information required or did he say they were in constant contact with the SFA regarding the issues surrounding the SFA membership ? well refused may be a strong word but by the same token he knew what info was required and the sfa clearly don't have it all yet. that might be the sfa's fault of course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,356 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 well refused may be a strong word but by the same token he knew what info was required and the sfa clearly don't have it all yet. that might be the sfa's fault of course. It's usually the nature of these things, having dealt with regulatory bodies over the years. They ask for information and the info that you send them prompts more questions. Doesn't mean that either party are at fault, although given the timing, I think that the SFA have probably not rushed to send out their supplementary request. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeeBlueDevil 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 There may be some truth in that the SFA asked for more information, but this piece by Leggat is pure anti Green propaganda. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.