Is Ally the Man for the job? - The McCoist Thread

[Zappa 0]

Maybe you should read my reply to kuznetsov who says it isn't a story/rumour I am not about to call him a liar as I don't know the truth of the matter, although in another place the act was said to have been witnessed and partaken of in a toilet at a boxing night.

 

If as I said Ally knows this person has a coke habit and signed him, he shouldn't be managing Rangers period.

 

I read your reply to Kuznetsov, but at least half of things he says seem to be nonsense.

 

We should maybe try to stick to facts here.

 

If we're going to allow the naming of a Rangers player as having a 'habit' and question the manager for signing him because of that 'habit', then let's hear some facts about who the witnesses are and what exact evidence there is.

[Zappa 0]

It's not as if there wasn't a big enough warning sign.....

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-17078759

 

He was accused of the crime, but cleared of the charge/crime by the court.

[kuznetsov 0]

I read your reply to Kuznetsov, but at least half of things he says seem to be nonsense.

 

We should maybe try to stick to facts here.

 

If we're going to allow the naming of a Rangers player as having a 'habit' and question the manager for signing him because of that 'habit', then let's hear some facts about who the witnesses are and what exact evidence there is.

 

people within his circle of friends. people who drink in the same pubs and casinos he frequented in edinburgh. like i said, it is no secret.

[kuznetsov 0]

He was accused of the crime, but cleared of the charge/crime by the court.

 

wasnt terry cleared too when we all knew he was guilty?

 

black was only cleared because someone couldnt be bothered going to court.

[frost 0]

I read your reply to Kuznetsov, but at least half of things he says seem to be nonsense.

 

We should maybe try to stick to facts here.

 

If we're going to allow the naming of a Rangers player as having a 'habit' and question the manager for signing him because of that 'habit', then let's hear some facts about who the witnesses are and what exact evidence there is.

 

I was very careful not to name anyone, however the link posted by FS did.

[Zappa 0]

I was very careful not to name anyone, however the link posted by FS did.

 

I know you didn't name Black, but I think if we're going to discuss the accusations AND bring Ally into it for signing the player, then would it not be fair to know who his accusers are?

 

Kuznetsov said it's "people within his circle of friends. people who drink in the same pubs and casinos he frequented in edinburgh", but that's not specific enough. That's what you call a rumour.

[kuznetsov 0]

I know you didn't name Black, but I think if we're going to discuss the accusations AND bring Ally into it for signing the player, then would it not be fair to know who his accusers are?

 

Kuznetsov said it's "people within his circle of friends. people who drink in the same pubs and casinos he frequented in edinburgh", but that's not specific enough. That's what you call a rumour.

 

maybe, i know its more than that. that is enough for me.

[forlanssister 3,060]

He was accused of the crime, but cleared of the charge/crime by the court.

 

The case was abandoned because witnesses failed to turn up that's not the same as being cleared.

[Zappa 0]

Fair enough folks, but the point stands that Black is currently only accused of being in possession of drugs, right?

 

If that's right and he's only accused, then what basis do we have for bringing Ally into it and having folk say Ally should get the sack for signing the player?

[simplythebest 0]

He shouldn't of course, but if it ever is found Black is in fact on cocaine his contract should be torn up.