der Berliner 3,263 Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 The transfer embargo has never existed in the rules and regulations, so there's nothing to abolish! And, on a sidenote, it was an SFA embargo, not one of the SPL. BTW, have the registrations of McGregor, Davis, Naismith and Co. been passed on? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 And, on a sidenote, it was an SFA embargo, not one of the SPL. The post I replied to didn't suggest it was an SPL embargo dB, although in all honesty, it was probably something spawned from a twisted anti-Rangers SPL based mindset. BTW, have the registrations of McGregor, Davis, Naismith and Co. been passed on? I've got no idea, but it stands to reason that any player registration transfers which we're still contesting won't have been passed on. It would certainly be good to get some up to date news on that front. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 And, on a sidenote, it was an SFA embargo, not one of the SPL. BTW, have the registrations of McGregor, Davis, Naismith and Co. been passed on? They must have because they are all playing for their new teams. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,263 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 They must have because they are all playing for their new teams. They did that all along, but these were temporary clearances given to the new clubs, ere the outcome of our demands were cleared. And I haven't heard a word to the contrary thus far. As in: we will probably not block them from playing or wanting them back ... but we still want a verdict about possible compensation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 They did that all along, but these were temporary clearances given to the new clubs, ere the outcome of our demands were cleared. And I haven't heard a word to the contrary thus far. As in: we will probably not block them from playing or wanting them back ... but we still want a verdict about possible compensation. I would doubt that a temp clearance would run for this long, I could be wrong. Compensation doesn't stop the clearance going through as far as I know and if it goes to a hearing could take months. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 Davis was sold remember. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 Davis was sold remember. Did we ever get that money? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.