Anchorman 0 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 It's 2 weeks on from the supposed official cut off date for them to appeal. Is anyone any the wiser as to whether they have actually appealed, or been given some kind of waiver on that cut off date? All threads to date have been speculation. Surely there must be an official source. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 David Gauke who has ministerial responsibility for HMRC has said they will appeal. They have to first negotiate the right to appeal however. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted January 8, 2013 Author Share Posted January 8, 2013 David Gauke who has ministerial responsibility for HMRC has said they will appeal. They have to first negotiate the right to appeal however. So was the supposed appeal deadline date in late December waived? Or was it a fictional date to begin with? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 There is certainly a time limit placed on their right of appeal. But they first have to establish a right of appeal based on legal grounds - not just because they disagree with it and apply to the tribunal to do so. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 they had to appeal to appeal before that date. it looks likely they did. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted January 8, 2013 Author Share Posted January 8, 2013 they had to appeal to appeal before that date. it looks likely they did. Which would have to mean they had a legal contention? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Which would have to mean they had a legal contention? Given the tribunal's verdict was not unanimous, I think that was always going to be the case bud. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,120 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Which would have to mean they had a legal contention? Or they think they do. Let's hope its thrown out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.