HMRC & The Ticking Clock

[onevision 1,454]

The Ticketus deal was between them and Rangers. Ticketus appear as a creditor in the list of creditors. Whether they then had the balance secured elsewhere doesn't change the fact that we owed the cash.

 

yes although it has since been established that a crime has taken place.

[onevision 1,454]

I'm still convinced that there was political intervention from a certain Labour politician who used his political influence to get HMRC to pursue us over these EBT's. The leaks were all part of it in the grand scheme of things.

It made the club unsellable at a time when SDM wished to sell (until Whyte appeared unfortunately).

Simultaneously the two bhoys at LBG were tightening the screw on the club regards its overdraft which AJ was successfully reducing.

Am I paranoid by saying everything was all part of a big set-up to destroy Rangers in which the predictable individuals in the mhedia played their part too and are continuing to do so today. We even had Keevins spouting nonsense on SSB on Monday night saying we were liquidated with over £100m debts - RUBBISH. The only debts the oldco eventually owed was Whye's nonpayment of PAYE/NI which HMRC allowed him to run up. The ticketus money to pay off LBG was a personal agreemnt between them & Whyte in which the monies never touched Rangers account hence ticketus having to chase Whyte for their money back

 

i agree and the wheels were set in motion the day Juninho's ebt was paid off.

[UCF2008 0]

The Ticketus deal was between them and Rangers. Ticketus appear as a creditor in the list of creditors. Whether they then had the balance secured elsewhere doesn't change the fact that we owed the cash.

 

That's correct, but you do have to wonder if they would have been so were it not for the fact our administrators were linked with setting up the Ticketus deal in the first place.

[RANGERRAB 3,299]

That's correct, but you do have to wonder if they would have been so were it not for the fact our administrators were linked with setting up the Ticketus deal in the first place.

 

Don't think so. The deal was between Ticketus & Whyte. The money never appeared in Rangers accounts. It was used to pay off LBG from Collyer Bristow. That's why Ticketus are pursuing Whyte thro'the courts.

[UCF2008 0]

Don't think so. The deal was between Ticketus & Whyte. The money never appeared in Rangers accounts. It was used to pay off LBG from Collyer Bristow. That's why Ticketus are pursuing Whyte thro'the courts.

 

Whyte takeover and Ticketus deal emails

 

David Grier claims Whyte withheld takeover information

 

Traynor: Duff and Phelps face serious questions over Rangers' Ticketus deal

 

IMO Grier was up to his neck in it.

[Bluedell 5,354]

yes although it has since been established that a crime has taken place.

 

I don't believe anyone has been found guilty of any crime in court.

[Bluedell 5,354]

Don't think so. The deal was between Ticketus & Whyte. The money never appeared in Rangers accounts. It was used to pay off LBG from Collyer Bristow. That's why Ticketus are pursuing Whyte thro'the courts.

 

You're wrong. The deal was between Rangers and Ticketus. Why else would Ticketus appear on Oldco's list of creditors?

[RANGERRAB 3,299]

You're wrong. The deal was between Rangers and Ticketus. Why else would Ticketus appear on Oldco's list of creditors?

 

This one of several anomalies regards D&P. The money they gave Whyte prior to buy out never touched Rangers account. How can Rangers be a creditor ? Whyte bought Rangers by using Rangers assets (season ticket sales) which is illegal.

[Bluedell 5,354]

This one of several anomalies regards D&P. The money they gave Whyte prior to buy out never touched Rangers account. How can Rangers be a creditor ? Whyte bought Rangers by using Rangers assets (season ticket sales) which is illegal.

 

 

Rangers are a creditor because it was Rangers that entered into the agreement with Ticketus. If Rangers then ask for Ticketus to pay the cash directly to LTSB it doesn't invalidate the agreement between the 2 parties and it doesn't mean that the cash wasn't for Rangers.

 

I guess technically Whyte bought the club for £1. There were various conditions attached to the purchase, one of which was clearing the loan. It will take greater minds than you andmeI to decide whether that is just a sub-agreement or actually part of the purchase price but my guess is that it is not technically part of it.

There were a number of conditions detailed, some of them some period after finalisation and if one of them wasn't fulfilled then it wouldn't invalidate the sale transaction so you would need to conclude that whether the loan was or was not cleared also would not and as such, the Ticketus cash wasn't part of the purchase.