ian1964 10,447 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 FOLLOWING the publication and broadcast of misleading and inaccurate information on STV this evening, a spokesman for Charles Green said: "Mr Green is appalled by this blatant attempt to discredit him. "These documents are not correct or valid and he did not sign Craig Whyte or his associate on as directors of Sevco 5088. "Mr Green was the sole director of Sevco 5088 until he resigned and became the founder director of Sevco Scotland, formed by Scottish solicitors. "If this documentation was correct then, as Sevco 5088 was formed as the initial bid vehicle, the administrators would have been negotiating a sale of the club to a company which had a director who was clearly forbidden from being involved with it. "Furthermore, it should strike people as deeply suspicious that these documents are being filed today 11 months after they were supposedly signed and on other documents Mr Greenâ??s home address has been mysteriously changed without his knowledge. "Furthermore, notice was filed publicly in January this year by Field Fisher Waterhouse and is on record at Companies House company seeking to strike off the company, yet four months later directors appointments are now being supposedly filed. "As stated previously these matters are now in the hands of lawyers who are preparing a file to be sent to Police Scotland and Mr Green cannot comment further on the details of that process. â? http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/3752-charles-green-statement 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 i notice he cleverly doesn't say the signature is a fake. i also believe he is still a director of sevco5088. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 i notice he cleverly doesn't say the signature is a fake. i also believe he is still a director of sevco5088. There's probably legal reasons behind him not being able to mention the word forgery right now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 There's probably legal reasons behind him not being able to mention the word forgery right now. aye like it isn't and it would be illegal to say it is. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 aye like it isn't and it would be illegal to say it is. Jesus, you trust Whyte more than Green now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 whyte says its greens signature. green doesn't deny it. open and shut case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotter 0 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Erm, read it again chaps. It says he did not sign off on Whyte being a director. Key words being DID NOT SIGN. Don't take this as unconditional support for green by the way, but I still trust him more than Whyte. Not hard right enough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Erm, read it again chaps. It says he did not sign off on Whyte being a director. Key words being DID NOT SIGN. It's not Green himself going on record and stating "I did not sign" though and there's a massive difference. Whether that's reading into it too much or not is yet to be seen, but Green has been caught out big time this week and revealed as an outright liar, so it's entirely possible that he's been told not to do any more talking at the moment because it would risk even more lies being revealed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Erm, read it again chaps. It says he did not sign off on Whyte being a director. Key words being DID NOT SIGN. Don't take this as unconditional support for green by the way, but I still trust him more than Whyte. Not hard right enough. Perhaps he's been foolish enough to sign blank forms and entrusted them to Whyte. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Erm, read it again chaps. It says he did not sign off on Whyte being a director. Key words being DID NOT SIGN. Don't take this as unconditional support for green by the way, but I still trust him more than Whyte. Not hard right enough. actually he says he did not sign him on as a director. given they arent directors yet thats true for now. though i hear if you go to companies house right now you will see them listed. its a misleading statement but it very clearly does not say he didn't sign this form. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.