Sandy and James Easdale are aiming to increase their shareholding

[Tumshie RFC 0]

Another disaster waiting to happen.

[Frankie 8,182]

What's interesting is whether or not this will flush our any other parties interested in buying up available shares?

 

For example, do the Easdales have enough money to buy a substantial controlling stake and fund the club? Or are they looking to make a quick buck off the back of other buyers?

 

One does wonder whether anyone else (such as King or AN Other) will go public?

 

And how much do our friends at the SFA know about such interest?

[Super Cooper 0]

oh and dealing with the scrote isn't the way to get credibility.

 

That turned me off right away.

[DUDE 0]

Great, some more "lifelong Rangers fans" looking to make some extra pounds. I bet them having a say is going to calm the whole boardroom situation isn't it.

[Zappa 0]

Shareholders in Rangers who are (supposedly) looking to increase their shareholding giving an interview to Chris McLaughlin on a bus? Ok, so they own buses, but if they owned amusement parks, would they do an interview on the dodgems or the ghost train? Embarrassing doesn't even begin to describe it.

[Tumshie RFC 0]

Shareholders in Rangers who are (supposedly) looking to increase their shareholding giving an interview to Chris McLaughlin on a bus? Ok, so they own buses, but if they owned amusement parks, would they do an interview on the dodgems or the ghost train? Embarrassing doesn't even begin to describe it.

 

What PR Exec thought that was a good idea? Was he the same guy who told the Tims it would be a good idea to hold a press conference in Bairds Bar.

[Zappa 0]

What PR Exec thought that was a good idea? Was he the same guy who told the Tims it would be a good idea to hold a press conference in Bairds Bar.

 

Maybe it was the same guy or people who came up with the idea of two guys called Green & Whyte taking control of Rangers and shafting the club up the shitter?

[DUDE 0]

Shareholders in Rangers who are (supposedly) looking to increase their shareholding giving an interview to Chris McLaughlin on a bus? Ok, so they own buses, but if they owned amusement parks, would they do an interview on the dodgems or the ghost train? Embarrassing doesn't even begin to describe it.

 

Now that would've been appropriate.

[Zappa 0]

What's interesting is whether or not this will flush our any other parties interested in buying up available shares?

 

For example, do the Easdales have enough money to buy a substantial controlling stake and fund the club? Or are they looking to make a quick buck off the back of other buyers?

 

One does wonder whether anyone else (such as King or AN Other) will go public?

 

And how much do our friends at the SFA know about such interest?

 

It's hard to fathom how the Easdales could have enough cash to buy any sort of significant shareholding. It sounds as though their assets are mortgaged up to the hilt and even if they weren't, their whole business portfolio is only worth a fraction of what the club's currently valued at.

 

To my mind, they've probably struck a secret deal to make it look as though they're buying into the club, but will then sell up whatever holding they accrue to whoever is pulling their strings and make a chunk of change in the process.

[Super Cooper 0]

Shareholders in Rangers who are (supposedly) looking to increase their shareholding giving an interview to Chris McLaughlin on a bus? Ok, so they own buses, but if they owned amusement parks, would they do an interview on the dodgems or the ghost train? Embarrassing doesn't even begin to describe it.

 

Exactly Zappa.