BEARGER 1,829 Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2013/09/sack-board.html?spref=tw 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Deeply unimpressed by CRO once again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chibmark 15 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 I thought it was pretty good. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tango 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Can't say I disagree with much of that statement 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAP1872 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Hard to disagree with that, sadly! It's getting to the point I don't want to spend any more of my hard earned on Rangers because, quite simply, is any of my cash actually getting to benefit Rangers. Up till now I never knew which way my shares would go at the agm but I have to say, even though I might not necessary agree with any single party for or against the board, the things that have happened from the board the last day or two have really stuck in the back of my throat. It's beginning to feel like the 1940's all over again. What a pathetic situation we are in!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Deeply unimpressed by CRO once again. Why so? The piece combines a mixture of fact and conjecture, but it's not difficult to decern which is which. After hearing that we are now paying lawyers to threaten supporters with legal action and then paying a PR company to tip off a banned organisation about it, the article certainly captures my feelings about the current Board. They may not be dishonest, but I've seen little or nothing from them which would justify their salaries. Quite the reverse, they seem bumbling, naive and lacking in experience or any gravitas. The sooner we can get some respected, high calibre business people to run the Club the better IMO. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 The sooner we can get some respected, high calibre business people to run the Club the better IMO. Unfortunately that's the position we've been in for the past 2 years. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Why so? The piece combines a mixture of fact and conjecture, but it's not difficult to decern which is which. After hearing that we are now paying lawyers to threaten supporters with legal action and then paying a PR company to tip off a banned organisation about it, the article certainly captures my feelings about the current Board. They may not be dishonest, but I've seen little or nothing from them which would justify their salaries. Quite the reverse, they seem bumbling, naive and lacking in experience or any gravitas. The sooner we can get some respected, high calibre business people to run the Club the better IMO. Because it pretty much says we as fans are immensely overly critical and love a good moan and now we've decided to have a go at the board. It takes away the credibility of the criticism and waters it down by implying we're just too fussy for our own good. Very poor and what I've come to expect from CRO. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.