Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 Without McColl's money (which he had no intention of ever using), I don't really see what the new board would have to offer, aside from having better intentions. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 Without McColl's money (which he had no intention of ever using), I don't really see what the new board would have to offer, aside from having better intentions. kings money or the other investors who are backing them and offering further investment. they are also in themselves highly qualified candidates. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 kings money or the other investors who are backing them and offering further investment. they are also in themselves highly qualified candidates. Why didn't McColl & King use their money to buy shares then? Then they would have had a major influence at the AGM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 McColl is the biggest charlatan of the lot. Worth nearly a billion and allowed us to go in the shitter. Could have got us for piggy bank money but he does not care. He only showed any real interest when others put their hands in their pockets. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 Why didn't McColl & King use their money to buy shares then? Then they would have had a major influence at the AGM. from who? at what price? how would that have helped rangers? green offered mccoll his shares at 70p each. his and all the rest of his cronies shares. king has made it clear he will put money into rangers not spivs pockets. mccoll has made it clear he can't invest due to business commitments. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 from who? at what price? how would that have helped rangers? green offered mccoll his shares at 70p each. his and all the rest of his cronies shares. king has made it clear he will put money into rangers not spivs pockets. mccoll has made it clear he can't invest due to business commitments. IE, he knows he cannot make much money out of us and so we are of little interest to him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 Don't understand why so many people are pro one side or the other, when the reality is there's no good option. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 king coming in was a promising option till the board blocked it. leaving that aside there are some good option for board members up for election. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 king coming in was a promising option till the board blocked it. Agree with you there. His previous tax disputes are unfortunate but the chance of us getting someone like him without any tax controversies are zilch. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crucible 0 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 Wonder how King's prediction of administration by Xmas is working out, doubt he will be investing any Rands. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.