Another excellent article by the Lawman

[der Berliner 3,247]

I noticed Ally complaining that they have still not cut his wages. You would think this would have been done poste haste.

 

As if they want Ally etc. to be on the books picking up a large wage.

 

Mabye I'm wrong, but wasn't it the newspaper that put some spin on it, while Ally only noted that his wage-cut was not signed as yet (though he was still happy to do it)?

[crucible 0]

I believe lawmans thrust is that murdoch totally misrepresented the truth with the acquiescence of others present, hence his final closing sentence.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Pedantry is not a get out of jail free card for directors salaries here.

[Zappa 0]

I believe lawmans thrust is that murdoch totally misrepresented the truth with the acquiescence of others present, hence his final closing sentence.

 

Maybe you should start referring to him as 'young lawman'.

[Ser Barristan Selmy 222]

I don't really see the point in this thread. They are paid far too much, whatever the exact figure is.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Nail on head

[Super_Ally 0]

I don't really see the point in this thread. They are paid far too much, whatever the exact figure is.

 

Apparently that's ok because someone got the figures wrong.

 

Muddying the waters.

[calscot 0]

I think about 2% of turnover should be the maximum for director and CEO wages. That would put Man U at £7.2m and Celtic at £1.5m. Ours would come out as 380k.

 

I think the Prime Minister earns £142500 for running (ruining?) the country.