Wallace willing to work with Rangers hopefuls

[Bigcid 0]

Not from what I have read so far. Much of the info on all parties is garbled stockmarket and company stuff that any normal folk has no clue to evaluate. (Though I guess some well-informed chaps on here will verify this accordingly ... which gives e.g. me not a real picture either, as quite a few people are not impartial (no insult to anyone on here!).)

 

I'd be especially concerned about the Murray's. They may be astute businessmen and Rangers people, but the Paul version was here throughout our fall and captained the failed Blue Knights (and I for one don't blame solely D&P here). The Malcolm version was victim of the Stockbridge video, but how on earth he got himself into the situation as a Rangers chairman in the first place, well ...

Quite a few of the Requisitioners presented quite some ego in the run up to the AGM as well ... now, how should we imagine that there won't be strife up there if they get elected? And you wonder, given their previous behaviour (all parties concerned) that they keep that privat and don't use the media again?

IMHO, Stockbridge should take a bow and a couple of the new chaps should join up with the board. These people should look for a new finance boss and then get on with it for the time being.

 

This is where the Easdales are stuck between a rock and a hard place they are trying to protect Charles Greens money man on the board they do not want the full facts being made public to the supporters, The club better advertise the position properly for a new Financial Director or we are back to square .

[Darthter 542]

I'm not sure what substantive point you are trying to make here.

 

You stated that the requisitioner's (I'm assuming you were referring to the whole group) were asked to "represent a significant block of shareholders".....

 

I'm simply saying that the only one that I was aware of was Jim McColl. I am of the belief that the rest of the group was then brought in by McColl.