Zappa 0 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 Whether you liked or disliked CG's consortium is was all above board and properly-funded That depends on your definition of "above board and properly-funded". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,263 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 That depends on your definition of "above board and properly-funded". Well until there are court cases and prosecutions........ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 funded by us and subject to a court case for fraud would be a more accurate description 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 The only dodgy owner we've had was Whyte. Whether you liked or disliked CG's consortium is was all above board and properly-funded Here fishy fishy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 Well until there are court cases and prosecutions........ We don't need court cases or prosecutions to tell us that Green was so embroiled in lies and deceptions that he couldn't even keep his own story straight because a lot of it reasonably well documented. Add to that the alleged investor kick-backs and IPO cash seemingly being used to fund the original purchase, then "above board and properly-funded" is not quite how it would be best described. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,263 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 funded by us and subject to a court case for fraud would be a more accurate description And when is this court case then? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,263 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 We don't need court cases or prosecutions to tell us that Green was so embroiled in lies and deceptions that he couldn't even keep his own story straight because a lot of it reasonably well documented. Add to that the alleged investor kick-backs and IPO cash seemingly being used to fund the original purchase, then "above board and properly-funded" is not quite how it would be best described. Used to fund the original purchase ? In what way? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 Used to fund the original purchase ? In what way? You're at it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,263 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 You're at it. No please explain 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 And when is this court case then? Next year I believe. It was in our accounts about it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.