Frankie 8,151 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 RANGERS director John Gilligan and Managing Director Stewart Robertson recently met with representatives from several supporters groups. Click HERE to read the minutes of the meeting: http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/club-news/item/9568-supporters-consultation-group-minutes Essentially, club are looking to create a new, single body with the initial approval of the existing groups. Hope it can work but not sure it will! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted July 6, 2015 Author Share Posted July 6, 2015 Perhaps plgsarmy or FS can clarify? Does this mean this existing organisations would be expected to fold into one new group affiliated with club? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Hallelujah! If this can be made to work, we'd have a really powerful fans organisation to be reckoned with. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Perhaps plgsarmy or FS can clarify? Does this mean this existing organisations would be expected to fold into one new group affiliated with club? Looks like it is to be nothing more than yet another layer for those who enjoy being on a committee, with existing organisations being free to carry on with their divisive ways. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 They will never talk for rangers fans only the point of view of a few. Wish the club would do away with all these groups and just put in place the ability for fans to communicate and invest through the club. No need or major want for these groups or committees to exist. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Perhaps plgsarmy or FS can clarify? Does this mean this existing organisations would be expected to fold into one new group affiliated with club? I imagine the RST,RF and the Association will continue in their present form too and that the RFB and the Assembly are basically toast. That's purely a personal interpretation though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted July 6, 2015 Author Share Posted July 6, 2015 I imagine the RST,RF and the Association will continue in their present form too and that the RFB and the Assembly are basically toast. That's purely a personal interpretation though. So, in effect, nothing is likely to really change....? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 So, in effect, nothing is likely to really change....? Aye, the Assembly gets a new name. The new board promised transparency, and the reason for this charade is certainly transparent. The RFB revisited. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 (edited) So, in effect, nothing is likely to really change....? Not sure but you're probably correct. I suppose you could argue that what's proposed is basically a souped up version of the RFB. The fact that there was no RSC representation on the RFB was a glaring failure and similarly with regards to the RST and RF especially given their clear mandates from the supporters. Edited July 6, 2015 by forlanssister 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Don't see how the RST and RF can come together given they have totally different aims and objectives 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.