fraser54 0 Posted March 1, 2007 Author Share Posted March 1, 2007 there was tv evidence was from the broomie rear and you see the tel aviv guy hitting the ball at McGreor running over to him then falling down BUT it's not very clear If that is true what you are saying SuperAlly that the ref's report said no contact why the hell is he getting done for this Uefa just like to keep having a dig at us 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 there was tv evidence was from the broomie rear and you see the tel aviv guy hitting the ball at McGreor running over to him then falling down BUT it's not very clear If that is true what you are saying SuperAlly that the ref's report said no contact why the hell is he getting done for this Uefa just like to keep having a dig at us I don't think UEFA have a personal vendetta against us Fraser. I've saw the footage from the Broomie and to say it's inconclusive is an understatement. You see the Hapoel player kick the ball over McGregor but what happens after that is anyones guess. It can't be used as evidence to backup McGregors case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 there was tv evidence was from the broomie rear and you see the tel aviv guy hitting the ball at McGreor running over to him then falling down BUT it's not very clear If that is true what you are saying SuperAlly that the ref's report said no contact why the hell is he getting done for this Uefa just like to keep having a dig at us Can't remmebr where I read that, but it was definitely reported somewhere. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fraser54 0 Posted March 1, 2007 Author Share Posted March 1, 2007 I don't think UEFA have a personal vendetta against us Fraser. I've saw the footage from the Broomie and to say it's inconclusive is an understatement. You see the Hapoel player kick the ball over McGregor but what happens after that is anyones guess. It can't be used as evidence to backup McGregors case. Right say they have seen the ball getting blasted at Mcgregor should De Bruno not get a bann for future european games as i see that as violent conduct 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Right say they have seen the ball getting blasted at Mcgregor should De Bruno not get a bann for future european games as i see that as violent conduct Possibly - but that is still no defence of McGregor 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whosthedado 1,504 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 I think we just have to get on with it now. The decision does seem poor, but we'll just have to hope Stefan comes in and does the business 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fraser54 0 Posted March 1, 2007 Author Share Posted March 1, 2007 Possibly - but that is still no defence of McGregor Not saying that but surely they have to take action on him, also if only the ref has seen it and no tv footage it should be a 1 match ban 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.