Frankie 8,182 Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 I'd go with that. As much as Warburton doesn't like to say it, he does like a bit of rotation throughout the season. If we add in McKay and Forrester then we've plenty of creative spark leaving Miller, Waghorn and, arguably, MoH to get the goals. As such, as much as we need another striker IMO, we're fine for the moment. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,440 Posted July 15, 2016 Author Share Posted July 15, 2016 Rossiter And England Win Again http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/rossiter-england-win/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted July 15, 2016 Share Posted July 15, 2016 If we add in McKay and Forrester then we've plenty of creative spark leaving Miller, Waghorn and, arguably, MoH to get the goals. As such, as much as we need another striker IMO, we're fine for the moment. don't agree. Kenny and Waggy aren't out and out strikers, We need a better finisher. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,279 Posted July 15, 2016 Share Posted July 15, 2016 don't agree. Kenny and Waggy aren't out and out strikers, We need a better finisher. The point here is that we don't exactly need a more clinical striker, but all our attack players being more clinical. As pointed out before, we created 15 to 25 chances per game last season, and converted less than 1/5. We can hardly foretell how our strikers and attackers will play this season though. We had and have to worsen the "goals scored against us average" though, as many teams never got more than a handful chances, but always were able to squeeze in one or two of those. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.