alskoosher 14 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Starred motions are heard in court, unstarred motions are heard or read in chambers, the QC's of the parties involved may or may not be requested to be in attendance by the Law Lord(s). The difficulty that we have is that we do not know the body of these motions until ruled upon, they are usually requested to enforce some part of a ruling or even indeed relax part of a ruling, time will be our guide now that the cut-off date has passed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walterbear 557 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 It’s pretty certain he’s going to comply. Just a debate about readiness. If he proves he is down the road in the process I think that’s the important thing. He might get some other minor punishment for missing the date but I wouldn’t worry about this. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alskoosher 14 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 14 minutes ago, Walterbear said: It’s pretty certain he’s going to comply. Just a debate about readiness. If he proves he is down the road in the process I think that’s the important thing. He might get some other minor punishment for missing the date but I wouldn’t worry about this. He hasn’t complied, he has broken a court order, TOP are now secondary in relation to the court. And I would worry with good cause. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 TOP accepted the share offer could be funded by that trust. They knew where the trust was operating from. Seems to me if it takes a bit longer to move that money, they'll simply wait until what he has put in train is complete. Don't think it's a major problem at all 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,283 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 46 minutes ago, alskoosher said: He hasn’t complied, he has broken a court order, TOP are now secondary in relation to the court. And I would worry with good cause. Well, you do that then. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 think the tims are more worried than us....they're so caring ! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walterbear 557 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Amazing how bbc twitters and news jumping on this. Meanwhile little reported or comments by them on child abuse scandal involving former employees and close associates of Celtic football club and it’s directors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Firstly can I apologise that the next bit came from an email sent to me earlier so I can't provide a link to who said it, but I was told it was a "reliable" source. --- " From studying the club accounts and bits and pieces of info picked up in my travels I expect (although I could be wrong) the forthcoming share issue and conversation of loans to bring in anywhere between £15m and £20m depending on the exact structure of the issue " Is this supposed to be taken seriously ? Aye, that amount of shares may get converted or whatever but what does it mean to any transfer budget or anything else ? Not being a money guy I maybe don't understand these things but "bring in" to me says money to be spent not money to pay off loans or whatever. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted April 28, 2018 Author Share Posted April 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, boabie said: Firstly can I apologise that the next bit came from an email sent to me earlier so I can't provide a link to who said it, but I was told it was a "reliable" source. --- " From studying the club accounts and bits and pieces of info picked up in my travels I expect (although I could be wrong) the forthcoming share issue and conversation of loans to bring in anywhere between £15m and £20m depending on the exact structure of the issue " Is this supposed to be taken seriously ? Aye, that amount of shares may get converted or whatever but what does it mean to any transfer budget or anything else ? Not being a money guy I maybe don't understand these things but "bring in" to me says money to be spent not money to pay off loans or whatever. It’s from FF, see post 622 in manager rumours thread. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 1 minute ago, BEARGER said: It’s from FF, see post 622 in manager rumours thread. Thanks BG - so another load of unsubstantiated garbage and guesswork ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.