Super_Ally 0 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 My feelings exactly mate. Nearly all moving in this transfer window have been poor. And because we took so long to force our best player out the door, we've not left ourselves long to use the cash. I would not now be suprised to see us blow the positive of the Hutton transfer (i.e the �£8mil it's brung in) by being ripped off for average players. E.g Lafferty. What's the point in bringing in such a high fee if we're going to waste the cash? Hutton to Spurs - Bad for the squad. Cousin potentially staying - Bad for the squad. Even if he scores a couple more. Ehiogu leaving - Good to get his wages off the books. Alexander - Decent cover I guess. Overall 500k deficit on keeper transfers though. Lost our other backup for free (likely) plus Carrolls wages. Daillly potentially in - Terrible, terrible waste of wages. Lafferty in - Ridiculous fee for an untested Burnley player. Rather Luke Moore for that money. We would only get �£3mil for Cousin remember. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I cant see us take Lafferty in for that 3.5 mill fee, not if we said no to Luke Moore. But overall IF Cousin leaves IMO our squad has weakend more than anything else. We'll see if we get someone else in though. WS may still get Larsen, although i still dont know why we are chasing strikers especially with us have zero ful back cover. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I cant see us take Lafferty in for that 3.5 mill fee, not if we said no to Luke Moore. But overall IF Cousin leaves IMO our squad has weakend more than anything else. We'll see if we get someone else in though. WS may still get Larsen, although i still dont know why we are chasing strikers especially with us have zero ful back cover. Cousin has the potential to be a fantastic player, as proven away to Lyon. Problem is he can't be arsed to play taht way for 99% of games and doesn't want to be here. When a player isn't prepared to work 100% for the team anymore then it's better that he goes. If he was that player against Lyon more often than not then my views would be different. Problem is he more often than not plays like Boyd with fewer goals and that I just cannot get my head around. Really hope he leaves now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,150 Posted January 30, 2008 Author Share Posted January 30, 2008 Dailly signs... http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/NewsDetail/0,,5~1229044,00.html 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest adamski Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 re: Lafferty he just reminds of Lee McCulloch at his age re: Daillly 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,150 Posted January 30, 2008 Author Share Posted January 30, 2008 Not a nice photo mate.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest adamski Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 Not a nice photo mate.... you're telling me 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I was down enough on that as it was, cheers for that Adamski. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 When was that photo taken? So the Dailly signing is official? The joy! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,150 Posted January 30, 2008 Author Share Posted January 30, 2008 you're telling me Maybe the group should have added Dailly chants to the Miller ones... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.