Jump to content

 

 

Crimson Dynamo

  • Posts

    1,566
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Crimson Dynamo

  1. Money changed hands between McInnes and agents. Contracts were written on fag packets ensuring he could have these young players when they were free from their current clubs. The phone calls were reminding him of that.

     

    Find myself wondering if this would still apply now if McInnes took over at Rangers.

  2. 1.

    a member of a warlike Asiatic nomadic people who invaded and ravaged Europe in the 4th–5th centuries.

     

    I don't think that describes Rangers or our support, I'd be surprised to find a Rangers fan that does. That's why I find it offensive.

  3. Barry Ferguson's take:

    http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/41763757

     

    "has to be someone who know Rangers inside out" and the size and "expectations of the club". I'm sure Pedro knew and knows the size and expectations. As for knowing it inside out - no-one knew it better than Greig. ...though McCoist knew it almost as well.

     

    Does he think before he speaks? Actually, can he think? He repeatedly says he's speaking just as a fan (as opposed to what - an applicant?) - and he's talking to the BBC. Some fan.

     

    EDIT: And Boyd: ""There's a series of outstanding candidates, Billy Davies, Derek McInnes and Alex McLeish have been mentioned. Without stating the obvious, it has to be someone who knows the club and can get results week in week out." "Must have the club in their DNA) (Again, Kris - like Greig, like Ally? - http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11788/11099747/rangers-man-needed-to-replace-pedro-caixinha-kris-boyd-says)

     

    Boyd and Ferguson are at it in my opinion.

  4. It's a big decision we've got coming up. The board need to be unified in the decision not like last time. If they can't then people need to leave for the good of Rangers.

     

    Also if the stories about Miller and Wallace are true they should both be cut loose at the earliest opportunity.

  5. Comparing Windass, who is never one of us in a million years, with Cooper is questionable.

     

    All wingers disappear. But not like Windass, who does it intentionally.

     

    What does that mean one of us?

     

    I like Windass, my criticism of him would be that he needs to stop disappearing in games. He starts off brightly or has a great first half then disappears. He needs to fix that.

     

    He's also played out of position in my opinion.

  6. This player certainly lives up to his name. What Pedro sees in him is anyone's guess. Surely the young guy Nemane could contribute more than him? Great result tonight, things are improving no doubt, but Windass is just a passenger and contributes absolute ziltch.

     

    Nothing wrong with having a moan after a good result, more constructive than having it after a bad one.

     

    Disagree, he just needs to be more consistent

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.