limeburner

Well that's perfectly fine, LB; but as I said earlier I don't know if their is any truth in the rumour and if not then can you please say where the investment is coming from?

 

I'm assuming you agree we do need some pretty major investment?

Yes, ofcourse we need major investment,where its coming from i do not know.I know this much though,i will take it from the majority of people or companys---just not off that lowlife.

He has revealed his contempt for us,we need to take note of that(at all costs)

So let me get this right.

 

If MA came in tomorrow and bought out DK for the £3/4million or whatever he's invested in shares and offered to pump £20/30 million into the Club, you wouldn't take it?

NO,i certainly would not.Hes a stinking vulture that hates and fleeces Rangers and the fans.If you would sell your soul for fat mikes gold,well, thats up to you and your conscience.

Hey BH,mike ashley hates Rangers,why cant you understand this.I know youre a fairly intelligent man----why dont you get this?

It was the loose cannon Brian Bowman (allegedly).

Seems to me it was the only fight we had in us (can any of them play full back?)

Rumour has it that if Mr Ashley can sell Newcastle United to the Chinese he will make Mr King an offer he can't refuse.

Cmon,at least try and keep the rumours realistic.

Yep,definite penalty-----I still cant believe he did it,crazy,crazy stuff(regardless of age)

There is also a rumour the transfer budget will be £3m + the money we get for Barrie McKay.

That will be 3.25 million then.

No excuse? They are better everywhere on the park and walking all over us at that level. You can try to match that with effort, but if theirs equally high, you end up losing. As we do today. Maybe you hope for some broken legs or something?

What are you taking about.Broken legs----again,What the hell are you going on about?

Youre out of line my friend,stop now.

3 going on 6.

 

Not sure where we go from here.

Good question?As long as folks dont start excusing this-----it will be a start.

But you have been watching football before, between better teams and weaker sides?

Yes to youre surprise i have.

We might be weaker, but its no excuse for being owned(at home as well).

Yes an elite bunch of 1.5m worth playing at their best is being pummelled by an elite bunch of 20m worth playing at their best.

 

In any case, even on our knees we're taller than them.

 

NB: The ref's windows will be safe this night. At least up till now.

We cant pass the ball to each other---Whats that got to do with player costs?

Being beaten is one thing----being celtics bitches is quite another.

That Celtic defender has been immaculate; barely had a touch of the ball but blocks our players and draws the foul; impeccable performance. I think his name is John Beaton?

Sure hes been bad but Cmon?

How is this still only 2-0? Surely everybody can now see us for what we are?

Their passing is appalling: either telegraphed, or badly executed.

Their marking at set pieces leaves a lot to be desired, with fhilth fc's major goal threats seemingly being given freedom of the paddock.

Why dont the moderators make this a sticky?

tavernier at right back

 

no toral but andy halliday

 

3 centre forwards and the best of those on the left wing?

 

the selection was like a sick joke

With hindsight you are right.Dont think it would have made much difference who we played.

It would have been different faces watching them play round us.If we cant fight we wont win.They wanted it more----they did.(even though they are better than us)

Actually Walker and Crocker duetted:

 

There's a uniform that's hangin'

in what's known as Father's room

A uniform so simple in its style

It's got no braid of gold nor silk

Nor hat with feathered plume

but me mother has preserved it all the while

One day she had me try it on

a wish of mine for years

"In mem'ry of your father dear," she said

And when I put the Sam Brown on

She was smilin' through her tears

When I put the Broad Black Brimmer

On me head

 

Chorus

It's just a Broad Black Brimmer

Ribbons frayed and torn

In a careless whisk of manys about the breeze

An old trench coat that's all battle stained and worn

And breeches almost threadbare at the knees

A Sam Brown belt with a buckle big and strong

And a holster that's been empty manys a day (but not for long)

When Ireland gets her freedom

The one they'll choose to lead 'em

will wear the Broad Black Brimmer

Of the I.R.A.

Fair play to you ---still doesnt make Tav a full back!!

The reason I don't accept it is not due to one game, it is because you have said it for months. It's not that long ago you said we'd had "ill luck" in front of goal whereas what had happened was that we had finished poorly. Prior to that you repeatedly said the visiting goalies had played blinders when in fact our poor shooting had made most saves easy for them, one or two good or reasonable saves do not a "blinder" make - it's what they are supposed to do.

 

"For that is just your opinion" Of course it's just my opinion - what am I supposed to do, post in with other people's opinions rather than my own???

 

"lacks IMHO objectivity." - right back at you. You say "luck and breaks" are "part of the game" - but for you they are always against us. We are always cursed by "ill luck" in front of goal", always. that takes a lack of objectivity to ludicrous extremes, IMHO. That's without even pointing to the old saying "you make your own luck".

 

And I belong to no cohort - here or anywhere else.

Isaw it---i saw it. Iwill say no more,Lucky breaks ffpppptt,no way.

We allowed Broonaldo to run the midfield for the first hour, after 30 minutes ra Sellik's possession was 81%. On the hour mark trailing 2-zip, we put Kenny Miller into the middle and he began running interference on Broonaldo's free reign. I do not think Halliday and Holt knew their starting positions. Why was Toral dropped to the bench?

 

My highlight of the game was Dembele's hamstring pinging.

 

As alluded to by another poster, BBC Radio Scotland had a breathtakingly objective half time panel. Richard Gordon, Tom English, Pat Bonner, and Chris McLaughlin. After telling us how super ra Sellik were, and how poor we were(all valid); they then spent several minutes wondering why Rangers had NOT been reduced to nine men by half time.

 

Pedro has plenty of food for thought before next Sunday's game. I think he has to accommodate Hodson, to release Tavenier's energy into midfield.

Last sentence is bang on the money.

We lost the midfield by all accounts, so you never know if it would have made a big difference. He may have prevented the 1st goal which in itself changes the dynamics of the game.

 

We will never know and, sadly, it simply doesn't matter anyway.

It will matter for next week though!!Lets see if PC will change things.Its important that he takes performances like this on board.

I do. I wouldn't have played Halliday - Toral would have been in the starting line up for me.

With hindsight,youre probably right,would he have made that big a difference though?Its a No from me.

I had no complaints about team selection.Performance,well,thats a different matter.

Stop. Just stop.

Ihad stopped.

Go away, i'm not in the mood to to defend posters becoming mindlessly confrontational with other posters none of whom incidentally have defended the performance today. And when you find more than one person requesting you go away you need to start listening.

Telling you to "go away"isnt confrontational----its just what i want you to do.

Give it a rest please. Stop looking for confrontation with others. Take a break and come back when you have calmed down.

Its not confrontation---its my opinion(Ok ,rather forcefully stated,as is my wont)

You should probably take a break from the computer G. Clearly you are emotional, frustrated and angry.

 

It isn't serving you any favours bringing it on here though my friend.

 

You are becoming confrontational and that isn't really you

Aye ok,but i saw what i saw.There can be no getting away from that.It wasnt acceptable-----thats the truth.