Rousseau

I think the guy had wound him up several times -- Carragher stated he had drove away a couple of times, only for the guy to follow and continue, with a phone camera. The Child is the innocent party; the father is not -- it's actually disgraceful behaviour from him. The guy is an idiot, but there is no need whatsoever for Carragher's reaction. I'd be surprised if he keeps his job.

Perhaps too early, but Docherty will get there too, along with McCrorie. I think Dorrans should be sniffing around too, when he's fit. I think those are most of the Scots we have.

Alves had a wee dig at Brown. I think there was another incident too, but I can't recall who? More of that please!

I understand, and am sympathetic to, the protests, but I agree, there are better ways to go about it.

Is that aimed at me? If you had read the post properly you would've seen that it was a hypothetical. If Bates was on, he may have been turned for the 3rd, but I thought he would've prevented the 2nd -- it was a criticism of Cardoso.

Perhaps not the place to post, but I usually look forward to the tactical segments on MNF, but I've just seen that St Brenda is the guest; I don't know if I can stomach that...

They are protesting against their owners; they've been relegated before without such recourse.

It's maybe because I don't drink!

I think I need to be on my own for a while...

Martin would've been a better replacement for Bates -- was he injured?

Yes, Bates may have been turned for their 3rd, but no way he gets out-muscled or out-run for their 2nd. Stupid aimless ball over the top!

Every time my thoughts drift back to the game I'm like...

I agree there's still a gap; I didn't claim there wasn't. I only said that the gap is closing; which it clearly is. We've still got a way to go.

No it wasn't. It was infuriating.

Second place was always the target this season. I'm much more confident of achieving that now than I was a few months ago.

Of course it's not good enough. He needs to learn -- I'm not sure how dropping him, or releasing him improves the situation; he's still our top goalscorer.

I didn't mean in terms of points, but in terms of quality. Going from being humiliated regularly to being absolutely enraged at a narrow defeat is most certainly progress.

Cardoso is poor one-on-one -- Bates or McCrorie would'nt have let Edward (?) onto his right-foot -- but we didn't have any other options. Something for the Coaches and DoF to think about for the summer.

I'd certainly have taken the money, but I'm also pleased to still have him. He's only 21; he's still got a lot of development to go. If he's £11M now, what value would he be when he stops missing these sitters? He'll be fine. He takes a tantrum at missing an impossible chance, only to get on with it and score the next again week; he'll be fine.

I agree, but it's understandable: we want to, and should have, beat these f*ckers; It's hard to get past that. We've closed the gap.

Still nope. He's ours, and the League's, top scorer. So he misses a few chances; what striker doesn't? How else is he supposed to learn and develop? We expect players to magically improve. He'll learn and move on. That doesn't mean I'm not fuming at that miss -- it was a f*cking joke. Outside of the foot rather than side-footing it into an empty net. So frustrating.

17 goals suggest otherwise. Only rangers fans would suggest dropping both our top scorer and the leagues top scorer because he misses a few chances. Jeez.

The quality into the box was poor, no doubt about it, but I can't help but feel that tactic was not the way to go since they basically sat back and soaked it up. We needed something different.