union

the board need to dump king now, before he takes us with him !

his advocate is getting rag-dolled by the judge, it is becoming embarrassing as are king's advocates bizarre claims of king not understanding emails or the 30% threshhold.

he doesn't have one,first thing Judge did was disagree with his Advocate.

looks like the party is over for dave.

5% of shares or voting rights is the trigger that allows a GM to be called, 30% of shares is the trigger for a formal cash offer.

I don’t remember RFC Ltd ever being liquidated, maybe you just have a creative memory.

no he really doesn’t, he also told TOP he has no knowledge of or responsibility to NOAL,something which TOP destroyed with incriminating emails and off shore documentation. many suffering from whyte syndrome wishing not to acknowledge that which is public knowledge,it will have the same result

King owns no shares although he could have lied to the takeover panel.

Couldn’t care less who RFV is but they contacted the reg who made 1872 backtrack. As for the working party resigning en masse,cg just happened to be passing through swanning about like he owns Ibrox ?

Should have added the dispensing of disruption and hassle by the CoS begins next Thursday over two days.

Yesterday at the court of session the wheels of the TOP action at the CoS finally ground into action. Interesting times ahead. LORD TYRE PETITION DEPARTMENT UNSTARRED MOTIONS P341/17 Pet: The Panel on Takeovers & Mergers for Orders Sec955 Lindsays

29.1+29.2 reads simply enough even for me; and is nothing like RF enshrined. 29. Termination and suspension of membership 29.1. Membership of the Company as a Donating Member is not transferable to anyone else. 29.2. Membership is terminated if the member dies or ceases to exist. 29.3. If a Donating Member during the period of their membership publishes material which is obscene, abusive, sectarian, racist, defamatory or which otherwise brings the Company into disrepute or engages in abusive, intimidating or aggressive behaviour the Board of Directors shall be entitled to suspend that Donating Member’s membership for a period of up to six months. Such a decision may not be made unless the Donating Member has been given at least 14 Clear Days’ notice that the decision is to be proposed specifying the circumstances alleged to justify suspension and has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard by or of making written representations to the Directors. It is well known that the working party resigned because it couldn't work with CG, yet you dig a deeper hole into which transparency is buried by denying CG's unwelcome input, many of us do not zip up the back. 1872 just another lame duck in our many minority fans created groups, a lot to be said for abandoning the lot and returning to RSC simple tried and trusted way of fan involvement.

Who are the usual suspects ? as far as you know the regulator was not involved due to being contacted by the usual suspects,so their concerns were not taken up by the regulator. It was only the benevolence of 1872 ? asking the regulator to check over CG’s edict that threw up this anomaly, which had been pointed out on here as well as other places long before this latest revelation. 1872 and blair are well matched, club vehicles.

The clue is the word inherit,you never did answer if the regulator became involved.

So why did the regulator intervene if all was/is above board.

did the regulator get involved in this,one disaster after another with this lot.

agreed, and someone leaked to tro first and foremost.

time for quiet celbration, not recriminations onwards we go.

tattie munchers hovel

back in the day it was it sticks and stones,today is the time of the new age easily and perpeptually offended,dry boak !

those who paid £500 to RF may find their heritable rights are going to disappear also.

CG appears to be the problem.

seems they cannot work with the boards overseer,unelected overseer at that.

1872 working party have resigned en masse, wuestion is why.

If post 325 was not clear enough I will leave you to plot a course on denial ?