chilledbear

Walter Mitty springs to mind.

Why should Whyte have any respect or even care about Rangers. He seems not to have any for his own reputation.

You seem to believe the media when it suits.

Whyte has removed him from the Board.

Whyte is not RANGERS.

As Brahim says, if he is totally unreliable in a court of law, why would he be any different with the fans.

Just another riddle in the whole sorry mess.

Misha Sher is the guys name. Piece about him in the Mag this month.

More in the Herald tomorrow I believe.

Surely some of the tax issues in the big case are over 6 years old.

Give this a wee read lads. http://www.glescapals.com/rangers/rangersforever.htm

Is it correct, anybody know?

Ally thinks it will be done early next week. http://t.co/f99V33gd

http://t.co/hkB059Z8

The only bright spot would be 3 points.

Something wrong with the man. How the hell did we end up with him.

Yes, I understand the consequences of departing from the approved minutes. But let me ask you both, what is the point of meetings, if the same questions and the same answers are produced everytime. These minutes could have come from any of the meetings. Secondly, what would the consequences be for Whyte, if the Assembly gave out a statement to the Supporters, saying there were important questions being asked which the Chairman refuses to answer. If CW then turned round and said no more meetings, how would that go down with the fans. Would he risk it? Perhaps we would get to the truth a lot quicker, but then some might not get a seat in the Directors Box.

It depends if you trust him. I don't so yes, I would like to know what securities he has given Ticketus.

I don't agree. The Chairman confirmed the borrowing was over a three-year period and was secured against one of his companies and not Rangers Football Club. You don't need financial knowledge to ask which company. It is the questions people will not answer that are the most interesting. As I said all so civilized.

Surely it would depend on the questions HMRC are asking. If they are asking about the takeover or the ex-directors part in the takeover, would they not question them about the Ticketus deal if it showed in the books in April.

We are a long way from the end of this chapter in our history, IMO things will get a lot worse before they get better. But surely it is better we go down that road knowing the truth, the whole truth no matter who it hurts. Everything should be up for scrutiny, from DM to CW. It must be better for Rangers in the long run.

Are the ex-directors not being questioned by HMRC? Perhaps that is why they are questioning the take-over now. That is the reason Paul Murray saw the date of the Ticketus deal.

I have taken this from another Forum According to official HMRC docs shown to Paul Murray, Ticketus sent £24.4m to Whyte's lawyers account on April 7. The takeover happened on May 6.

If he shows us the accounts, we will see when the ticketus deal was done. So simple.

All I take from this is. Everything is so civilized. Everyone has to agree, while Rangers are going down the plug 'ole. A bit like Ibrox on match day, no passion, no hard questions being asked. The band will be playing while Rangers become the laughing stock of Scottish Football.