Jump to content

 

 

SlimJim

  • Posts

    72
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

18 Good

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This is why I’m very wary of the attitude of some fans that take umbridge to any criticism of the “club”. The BBC for example were on to Charles Green fairly early on and were shouted down by the fans. Objective journalism, where it exists, should not be decried. I do think there is an anti- Rangers agenda among selected journalists (including at the BBC) but people need to scrutinise what’s being said before knee jerk reactions.
  2. Agreed, it’s perfectly obvious it’s a whole new ball game if the set up changes. Our current team would have no bearing to that in a new league and we’d be in the top 4 supported clubs, no problem, and probably number 1. I’m not sure it’s going to happen anytime soon, unfortunately.
  3. The 3 teams is only for the first season then it’s based on results. The Netherlands could have six teams by the 4th season if they were good enough.
  4. It’s TV money and the clubs we’re looking at in the Atlantic League come from big cities and will be the major clubs of their own countries. This means advertising revenue, not of Champions League level but close to the individual leagues of the big nations (England and Spain aside). There’s no suggestion this is in place of CL just the new bread and butter set up of the smaller nations.
  5. I think broadcasters would be top dollar for Rangers v PSV and Rangers v Celtic in a bigger league, too. There’d also be Sporting Lisbon, Porto. It could be Scotland, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Norway. The advantage of having Norway and Denmark is the other countries could potentially displace their six.
  6. That’s a bit short sighted considering the sums that would be available. No Dutch team will win the Champions League with the status quo.
  7. Fair enough but i don’t think we’ll ever compete in the Champions League without some big changes. I guess it’s how content we are just to win in Scotland.
  8. I saw a post on Follow Follow about this. I’d have 3 teams from 6 countries, with the bottom 3 teams of the 18 relegated regardless of country and the 6 winners of the feeder leagues play off for 3 places for promotion (losers get big cash bonus). That way each country can get as many teams as they are capable of in the big league. Games on a Saturday, Champions league places for top 4 etc, but keep domestic cups. Decent cash to be filtered into feeder leagues. Thoughts?
  9. Going on loan can be a planned route to the first team, it isn’t usually a sign a player is unwanted.
  10. it remains to be seen if they were there for Hardie. He does have a passing resemblance to Ian Rush in the way he plays.
  11. We need, as a club, a core of capable Scottish players, with an idea about what playing for Rangers means. He’s a defender that has proven he can defend , let’s keep him.
  12. He’s very close to the end of his contract. It needs sorted.
  13. Great news, his level has increased a lot in recent months.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.