CammyF 6,885 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 No further action against Ferguson and McGregor and no mention of any of the other 'boozees'.... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internationals/7991629.stm Cammy F 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
H1ndy 0 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 sweep sweep 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I wonder if any of the other participants are also on a "yellow" then ??? Sweep sweep indeed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 6,885 Posted April 9, 2009 Author Share Posted April 9, 2009 Once again, Mr Liewell has done a fantastic job in ensuring that his player come out of this smelling of roses. There were reports that Rangers would make an official statement once the SFA had released theirs. Are we waiting with baited breath or are we expecting another cop out from our custodians? Cammy F 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,182 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Doesn't make sense. If all the players got a 'yellow' card why were BF/AM the only ones dropped? Bizarre and I'm really disappointed with Gordon Smith in all of this. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Doesn't make sense. If all the players got a 'yellow' card why were BF/AM the only ones dropped? Bizarre and I'm really disappointed with Gordon Smith in all of this. Not that I am disagreeing but you can be assured that the stance is that "they were the last two still drinking". Do I think that going to your room 30 mins before the "last two" means being let off scott-free ? No. But the SFA can justify this as AM and BF were, supposedly, the last two drinking. It is nothing short of a farce. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I'd imagine Whittaker will be next in line for a 'red card'. No doubt for picking his nose or some other form of 'unacceptable behavior'. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Thank fuck. I was getting bored of the constant media "exclusives" being brandished across the front and back pages of shitty tabloids. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I'd imagine Whittaker will be next in line for a 'red card'. No doubt for picking his nose or some other form of 'unacceptable behavior'. Only if he either.......... A) Flicks it at Burley or B) Eats it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Thank fuck. I was getting bored of the constant media "exclusives" being brandished across the front and back pages of shitty tabloids. You think that will end just because the SFA wants to draw a line under it ?? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.