Tumshie RFC 0 Posted April 14, 2011 Share Posted April 14, 2011 Another columnist who totally missed the point. It was McCoist's first offence and he appealed. It was Lennon third visit to the SFA beaks and he did not appeal. Hartson doesn't have a clue although it is funny to watch the Tims get so razzed up by the decision. They are doing what they do best - complaining!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted April 14, 2011 Share Posted April 14, 2011 It's got nothing to do with scoring over 100 goals for the Hoops. I just don't know what else people are meant to think. If you punish one side, then surely you also have to punish the other? Eh? Not if both sides committed different "offences". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yieldshields loyal 0 Posted April 14, 2011 Share Posted April 14, 2011 girfuy! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 0 Posted April 14, 2011 Share Posted April 14, 2011 Pish talk. You have to love the way that every single commentator seems to be ASSUMING that Mccoist must have said something to Lennon to instigate it. I think he did too but the SFA have to act on FACTS. Fact is McCoist was in no way aggressive in manner towards Lennon. Lennon, however, was blatantly aggressive towards McCoist. Same with McBride - he says that McCoist "must have said something to spark Lennon" - really ? The same Neil Lennon that has NEVER, EVER needed anyone to do something to spark him into lunacy ? Give me a break. Fact is, McCoist was cool, calm and collected in his demeanour regardless of what he said to Lennon. On video evidence McCoist did nothing wrong. On video evidence Lennon was blatantly aggressive in manner. It isnt that difficult, surely not even for a QC to understand. Lets put it this way, if McBride is a defense QC he would absolutely have no problem in getting McCoist off the hook for that incident. He would have a far tougher time doing so with Lennon due to his actions. Bang on the money. He could have asked him to come round to his house for a sunday roast with the missus and kids that weekend for all we know, and the evil eyed fuck decided that was offensive so told him in no uncertain terms where to go 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.