pete 2,499 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I am slowly(not definite yet) thinking we should possiblyeee\maybeeee let Kyle Barton return to Arsenal in January. To be honest He is never going to oust Boca orGoian and I think we have enough defensive cover with Perry Whittaker Papac all able to play centre-half and I don't really see kyle as the midfield player we hoped he may be. I think Ness and Hutton are better. As I say I am still undecided but starting to lean that way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Afraid my memory doesn't go that far back. Inverness, 13 August 2011, surely you are not too old that you can't remember that far back! He ran the midfiled with effortless ease till he got taken off injured at half time. Sadly seems permanently injury prone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 It might take another year or two, but I'm almost certain that Ness will get over his injury problems. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I am slowly(not definite yet) thinking we should possiblyeee\maybeeee let Kyle Barton return to Arsenal in January. To be honest He is never going to oust Boca orGoian and I think we have enough defensive cover with Perry Whittaker Papac all able to play centre-half and I don't really see kyle as the midfield player we hoped he may be. I think Ness and Hutton are better. As I say I am still undecided but starting to lean that way. Hutton + Bartley = Barton :grin: As was seen today he is a complete waste of space in midfield; the difference when Bendicksen came on was 200%. As you say he is not going to oust B&G so at best is a reserve C/H. Arsenal will not allow us to keep him if he is not playing, which is one of the reasons he started today, I'm sure. Why else play three defensive midfield players? I am equally sure that the only reason we took him again was because we didn't have cover at the time. So best to send him back. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I am slowly(not definite yet) thinking we should possiblyeee\maybeeee let Kyle Barton return to Arsenal in January. To be honest He is never going to oust Boca orGoian and I think we have enough defensive cover with Perry Whittaker Papac all able to play centre-half and I don't really see kyle as the midfield player we hoped he may be. I think Ness and Hutton are better. As I say I am still undecided but starting to lean that way. Decent player, decent back up. But if he isnt playing and we have cover then, as you say, probably best to just send him back - especially if Hutton comes back as he is more of a natural CM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Hutton + Bartley = Barton :grin: As was seen today he is a complete waste of space in midfield; the difference when Bendicksen came on was 200%. As you say he is not going to oust B&G so at best is a reserve C/H. Arsenal will not allow us to keep him if he is not playing, which is one of the reasons he started today, I'm sure. Why else play three defensive midfield players? I am equally sure that the only reason we took him again was because we didn't have cover at the time. So best to send him back. I told you my memory was bad I can't even remember a name after 7 hours. The fact that Arsenal won't except that he is a reserve was also part of my thinking. Maybe we can ask for van Persie in exchange. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 That Bartley was meant to be suffering from a chest infection and I was surprised to see him start the game. I thought surely Bendickson, or even McKay/Fleck would have been before him? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 That Bartley was meant to be suffering from a chest infection and I was surprised to see him start the game. I thought surely Bendickson, or even McKay/Fleck would have been before him? He made a startling recovery and reported to training at lunchtime yesterday.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juffery 0 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 He made a startling recovery and reported to training at lunchtime yesterday.... Ally lit up the Bart-signal as we were short of defensive players 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Ally lit up the Bart-signal as we were short of defensive players Just as well or we might have seen Jig and Broadfoot playing the double holding midfield roles. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.