Jump to content

 

 

Celik could cost rangers nothing - Rangers in compensation row


Recommended Posts

RANGERS could net Mervan Celik for free after an administrative blunder by Swedish club GAIS.

 

The Light Blues were expected to have to pay £200,000 in compensation for the Swedish under-21 winger.

 

Express Sport can reveal that the SPL champions have been told they might not have to pay the compensation set down by FIFA guidelines.

 

GAIS still believe they are entitled to training compensation because Celik, who made his debut in the weekend win over Hibs, is under the age of 23,

 

Their case, however, could be undone because they failed to offer the player a new contract 60 days before his last deal expired.It is understood that GAIS officials did offer Celik a deal verbally but never put it in writing and therefore have no documentary evidence to show FIFA should Rangers challenge them.

 

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/299734/Celik-could-cost-Rangers-nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pay nothing. The player did not receive a written contract offer and therefore had nothing to rely on. Verbal contracts are fairly meaningless and therefore we don't know if GAIS wanted to keep him or not.

 

Had we not signed him he may have been released. We don't know if it was a mistake or deliberate. Nobody knows what their intentions were and as such we should not have to pay anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly ... we should show the dignity that befits a club of our stature and pay them this compensation. After all, they groomed him into the star player he will become ...

 

Couldnt agree more. Yes, it is a time of fiscal prudence, but RANGERS are more than that. Show the dignity & integrity that we should have and pay them in good faith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldnt agree more. Yes, it is a time of fiscal prudence, but RANGERS are more than that. Show the dignity & integrity that we should have and pay them in good faith.

 

Had the said fee already been agreed between the clubs?,if so then it would be wrong to not pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.