Leggat - Regans' New Attack On Rangers Revealed

[ian1964 10,448]

STEWART REGANâ??S Scottish Football Association is demanding Rangers sign a blank cheque to allow the SFA to continue punishing them.

 

And without that abject surrender by Rangers to Regan, he will make sure the SFA do not give Rangers a licence to play.

 

In fact, so far reaching does Regan want the punishments to extend and so badly emasculated does he want Rangers to be, that Regan is insisting the club signs up to an agreement to accept any punishments he wants to hand them in the future for any previously undisclosed breaches of SFA Articles by conman Craig Whyte.

 

This is the latest astonishing news from the sixth floor at Hampden where Regan rules the roost and where he seems determined to hold the sword of Damocles over Rangers on and on and on into the future.

 

It smacks of something which many may believe goes even beyond vengeance. It smacks of what many may believe is a vindictive hatred of Rangers spewing from Stewart Reganâ??s chief executive office inside the SFA lair on the sixth floor of Hampden.

 

I have in my possession a document drawn up on Reganâ??s behalf by Glasgow law firm Levy and McRae which lays out the conditions the SFA have told Rangers they must agree to, to be allowed to get a licence to play.

 

And it makes frightening reading.

 

Frightening reading not just for Rangers supporters. But for anyone who may be left in Scotland who believes in natural justice.

 

This dynamite document gives a startling and scary insight into the mindset of the man who sits at the pinnacle of the game in Scotland, SFA chief executive Stewart Regan.

 

It is a document which is a damning indictment of the way Stewart Reganâ??s mind works.

 

The 13 point list of items required by the SFA from Sevco before the governing body can re-admit Rangers, also contains most of what any reasonable person would expect to be there.

 

Details of directors and shareholding in Sevco, plus eight sub section questions about Sevcoâ??s business plan are all legitimate questions.

 

But when the deadly document reaches Item 12, headed, Sanctions, Stewart Reganâ??s SFA gets nasty and aims three loaded guns at the head of Rangers.

 

The first pistol is cocked by demanding that Rangers confirm they will accept such sanctions as are proposed by the SFA in relation to current proceedings.

 

Which looks suspiciously as though Regan wants Rangers to agree to ignore the Court of Session judgment delivered by Lord Glennie and accept the transfer ban which the learned Judge has declared unlawful.

 

Is that not unlawful in itself?

 

Or does Stewart Regan believe being a pal of Celtic supremo Peter Lawwell sets him above the law?

 

The second gun is a loaded revolver which demands confirmation from Rangers re EBT sanction position at SPL level and subsequent appeal to the SFA.

 

That looks like Rangers are being ordered by Stewart Regan to sign up to any punishment which may be imposed on them by the vindictive bigots of the SPL who refused them entry, as well as giving up any right of appeal to the SFA.

 

But it is the third gun which is the weapon of mass destruction.

 

It demands that Rangers confirm that they will accept responsibility for any breach of the Articles etc by the OldCo which has not so far come to light.

 

That means any other dodgy deals, any more cash scams, pulled off by that ace conman, twister and huckster, Craig Whyte, will lead to Stewart Regan being able to hand down to Rangers whatever punishment takes his fancy.

 

Has Regan forgotten that the Crown Office have ordered a criminal investigation into how Craig Whyte bought Rangers from David Murray and how he ran the club?

 

Has Stewart Regan forgotten that this probe is being undertaken by the Procurator Fiscal, the Serious Fraud Squad and Strathclyde Police?

 

Or, once again, does Stewart Regan believe that sharing the SFA boardroom with Celtic chief executive Peter Lawwell puts him above Scots Law?

 

There will surely be many who may take that view.

 

Consider this; should the Crown Office-ordered-investigation uncover evidence that Craig Whyte has not merely infringed against SFA Articles, but also broken the law and should Whyte be found guilty and jailed, then natural justice would surely be for all football punishments already inflicted on Rangers for what Whyte has done, to be overturned?

 

But instead of embracing such decency, such honesty, such natural justice, what Stewart Regan is saying is, if that happens and should the investigation uncover fresh infringements of the SFA Articles by Craig Whyte, Rangers must agree to accept more punishments.

 

Surely meaning there is no way Rangers will be playing anywhere next season if that is what they are being ordered to agree to if they are to be given a licence to play by Stewart Regan.

 

Indeed, what the rest of Scottish football, from the SPL, through the SFL and down through the other organisations linked to the Scottish Football Association, should be doing is demanding copies of Stewart Reganâ??s deadly document and askingâ?¦.

 

Is Stewart Regan fit for purpose.

 

And they should be doing it not just before it is too late for Rangers. They should be doing it before it is too late to save Scottish football from Stewart Regan.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

this is old news but its very very pertinent.

 

we absolutely must not sign up to this.

[andy steel 0]

I need help clearing up an issue about Regan.

 

Does he rule by diktat, or is he part of a committie of some sort? For if, as seems likely, he gets the old heave-ho in the near future, we wouldn't be much further forward if the same mental policies continued to emanate from Hampden.

 

Is this witch-hunt Regan's doing, or the SFA's doing?

[CumbernauldGers 0]

Sorry but Leggo is just about as reliable as John Brown.

[Jim1955 12]

Sorry but Leggo is just about as reliable as John Brown.

 

This, if true is easily handled, simply say no! Their only response would be to expel us and I would like to see the SFA explain that to the corporates eg sky and others who are watching this carefully in the background.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Sorry but Leggo is just about as reliable as John Brown.

 

yeah and he's right about this.

[der Berliner 3,286]

Green should have a lawyer around when Regan demands it and wants this signed. Next day he can sue him/the SFA for coercion.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

not if we sign away our right to sue.

[foggy dewhurst 0]

anybody who signs away their/his rights to justice deserves etherything they get even mass murderers have the right to justice .

[Guest Bluenose80]

This, if true is easily handled, simply say no! Their only response would be to expel us and I would like to see the SFA explain that to the corporates eg sky and others who are watching this carefully in the background.

 

They have already admitted they cannot survive without us so we just need to stand our ground when the time comes. Cold hard fact is they need us more than we need them as if they kick us out we have grounds to join a league over the border in the same all clubs in Luxembourg play in the Swiss league because they have no league of their own. We can show we are being denied from playing in Scotland so we should be allowed to play across the border.