Jump to content

 

 

Rangers bosses knew about Craig Whyte's shady business dealings BEFORE Ibrox takeover


Recommended Posts

I am beginning to wonder why old news like this has been dragged up again by the daily rheb, it couldn't possibly be the rhebs sports editor jabba showing us all how lucky we are that Green rescued us and by doing so ingratiating himself even further with Green, with a share issue allegedly looming ?

 

I don't think it necessarily reflects well on Green. I like Green, but some folk might read that article and, considering the chain of Murray - Whyte - D&P - Green, not be too happy about his (admittedly quite distant) links with this alleged corruption. Not much of a "big-up" if that was the intention IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it necessarily reflects well on Green. I like Green, but some folk might read that article and, considering the chain of Murray - Whyte - D&P - Green, not be too happy about his (admittedly quite distant) links with this alleged corruption. Not much of a "big-up" if that was the intention IMO.

Are you really saying all 4 of them sat down and planned everything?

 

As much as has happened there's still plenty of suggestions too far fetched.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you really saying all 4 of them sat down and planned everything?

 

As much as has happened there's still plenty of suggestions too far fetched.

 

Not seriously, no.

 

All I'm saying is that some people might read the article in the OP and think, "Hurray, Green saved us from this corruption", while others might read it and think, "Hmmm, Green emerged from this corruption". I don't think it reads as a glowing endorsement of Green, so I'm not convinced that it's an attempt to suck up to him like frost is.

 

The timing of it is strange though.

Edited by Thinker
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is the first time any of the actual content of the report has been published rather than just hinted at.

 

The entire board resigning woul have achieved what exactly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the first time any of the actual content of the report has been published rather than just hinted at.

 

The entire board resigning woul have achieved what exactly?

 

I would say it would have resulted in all the right questions being asked of Whyte, rather than inventing his wealth of the radar status, plenty of people had him sussed from his boiler room ops at MHG to his asset stripping and non payment of debts, plus his corporate office in Bath Street that looked more like a Janny's cupboard.

 

Honour and business just don't mix.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they didn't resign they stayed and opposed the takeover. far more of a statement than walking out.

 

of course they were just accused of wanting to keep their club ties by some.

 

I nearly laughed opposed the takeover, who opposed it ? keep an eye on Whyte that was opposing it, you are right on one thing all they were interested in was hanging on to the tie and blazer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.