the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=7241D12A18C19C59!387&app=PowerPoint 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Share Posted November 13, 2012 intention to pay a dividend. entirely unacceptable imho. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 intention to pay a dividend. entirely unacceptable imho. If the company/club is doing well I've no problem with it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Share Posted November 13, 2012 each to his own but its just a way for rich people to take cash out of the club. celtc pay a dividend whether they win trophys or make a profit or not. if we go down that route then we are just a cash cow being milked like them. makes it a good investement though celtc were for the fans who invested. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Totally agree with Gunslinger , there is absolutely no need for a dividend to be paid out , given the enormous amount of shares being offered , this dividend for normal shareholders is buttons 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BoK360 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Lots of very specific talk about not having "bank debt". Not "no debt", but very precise no "bank debt". My first thought, then, was where and how much is the non-"bank debt". And dividends-smividends. I thought the idea was to keep the money inside the club, not leak it out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 I think this is only part of a presentation for institutional investors , this is not the IPO document that is getting sent out 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest govansw1 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Imran Ahmed not listed as a director and Edmiston House spelt wrong 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 Lots of very specific talk about not having "bank debt". Not "no debt", but very precise no "bank debt". My first thought, then, was where and how much is the non-"bank debt". And dividends-smividends. I thought the idea was to keep the money inside the club, not leak it out. This is the important bits imo. Only a draft surely. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,271 Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 A draft hopefully. IMHo very unspecific too and perhaps aimed at a broader audience than "just" Rangers supporters. I would assume that you will get "normal" people with serious money easier involved if you speak of possible dividends ... and it remains to be seen what percentage of investment these sort of people bring in. I for one doubt that it will be that much. While it sure makes neat reading, continually comparing us with the likes of ManU, Real, or Bayern is stretching it a "little". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.